Reframing the frame

This article critically revisits the notion of semantic frame in light of developments in Cognitive Linguistics and the growing adoption of sociocognitive approaches in language studies. It argues that, although Frame Semantics originated from Charles Fillmore’s efforts to describe lexical meaning, its foundations have always been deeply rooted in an experiential, interactional, and social conception of meaning. The first part of the text explores the epistemological connections between Frame Semantics and the core principles of Cognitive Linguistics, emphasizing the situated, embodied, and shared nature of human cognition. Subsequently, it examines the historical trajectory of Fillmore’s theory, from the distinction between cognitive and interactional frames to its interface with Lexicography through the FrameNet project. The second half of the article revisits Brazilian research that employs the notion of frame in various fields, highlighting the methodological flexibility and interdisciplinary potential of the concept. Applications that encompass both stable (cognitive frames) and dynamic (discursive and interactional frames) framing processes are emphasized, with special attention to phenomena such as reframing. Finally, the article discusses the limits and possibilities of using the concept of frame in contemporary linguistics. It concludes by advocating for critical and productive reinterpretations of Fillmorean theory, reaffirming its relevance for the analysis of social cognition in linguistic practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v67i00.8680047
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing the frame

Rove Chishman, Diego Spader de Souza, Aline Nardes dos Santos
2 citations
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
article

Reframing the frame

Rove Chishman, Diego Spader de Souza, Aline Nardes dos Santos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article critically revisits the notion of semantic frame in light of developments in Cognitive Linguistics and the growing adoption of sociocognitive approaches in language studies. It argues that, although Frame Semantics originated from Charles Fillmore’s efforts to describe lexical meaning, its foundations have always been deeply rooted in an experiential, interactional, and social conception of meaning. The first part of the text explores the epistemological connections between Frame Semantics and the core principles of Cognitive Linguistics, emphasizing the situated, embodied, and shared nature of human cognition. Subsequently, it examines the historical trajectory of Fillmore’s theory, from the distinction between cognitive and interactional frames to its interface with Lexicography through the FrameNet project. The second half of the article revisits Brazilian research that employs the notion of frame in various fields, highlighting the methodological flexibility and interdisciplinary potential of the concept. Applications that encompass both stable (cognitive frames) and dynamic (discursive and interactional frames) framing processes are emphasized, with special attention to phenomena such as reframing. Finally, the article discusses the limits and possibilities of using the concept of frame in contemporary linguistics. It concludes by advocating for critical and productive reinterpretations of Fillmorean theory, reaffirming its relevance for the analysis of social cognition in linguistic practices.

Cadernos de Estudos LingüísticosVol. 67
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR), Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (BR), University of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.