Case Studies of Policy Influence by Nonprofit Organisations

This article presents a comparative analysis of case studies illustrating how nonprofit organisations influence policy across international, national, and local levels. It examines advocacy strategies in human rights, environmental governance, and grassroots mobilisation, demonstrating how NGOs integrate evidence, framing, and coalition-building to shape outcomes. International NGOs such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch use monitoring and naming-and-shaming to mobilise diplomatic pressure, while environmental groups like Greenpeace and WWF combine insider negotiation with public protest to influence climate accords. Grassroots campaigns in Latin America and women’s rights movements in South Asia highlight how local legitimacy and framing strategies drive institutional reform, even within restrictive political environments. The analysis reveals recurring tensions between global and local actors, elite and grassroots advocacy, and normative aspirations versus structural constraints. By mapping mechanisms and outcomes, the article bridges theoretical insights and practical lessons, showing how nonprofit advocacy simultaneously enables and challenges democratic governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pblplcpwinfdsmk-05
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Studies of Policy Influence by Nonprofit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Case Studies of Policy Influence by Nonprofit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of case studies illustrating how nonprofit organisations influence policy across international, national, and local levels. It examines advocacy strategies in human rights, environmental governance, and grassroots mobilisation, demonstrating how NGOs integrate evidence, framing, and coalition-building to shape outcomes. International NGOs such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch use monitoring and naming-and-shaming to mobilise diplomatic pressure, while environmental groups like Greenpeace and WWF combine insider negotiation with public protest to influence climate accords. Grassroots campaigns in Latin America and women’s rights movements in South Asia highlight how local legitimacy and framing strategies drive institutional reform, even within restrictive political environments. The analysis reveals recurring tensions between global and local actors, elite and grassroots advocacy, and normative aspirations versus structural constraints. By mapping mechanisms and outcomes, the article bridges theoretical insights and practical lessons, showing how nonprofit advocacy simultaneously enables and challenges democratic governance.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Case Studies of Policy Influence by Nonprofit Organisations — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS