Barriers to Nonprofit Influence in Public Policy

Although nonprofit organisations have become increasingly visible in governance and policy debates, their influence is often constrained by structural, political, and organisational barriers. This article identifies six interrelated obstacles: limited resources and donor dependency, restrictive regulations, shrinking civic space, internal tensions between professionalisation and grassroots legitimacy, fragmentation within civil society, and systemic power asymmetries relative to governments and corporations. These constraints shape not only the scope but also the sustainability of advocacy. Drawing on global evidence, the article shows that nonprofit power is relational and contingent on institutional and political environments. For scholars, it advances a structural understanding of advocacy limitations; for practitioners, it provides strategies for resilience—diversifying funding, strengthening coalitions, and balancing accountability to both donors and communities. Ultimately, it argues that nonprofit influence cannot be assumed even in democratic settings and must be continuously negotiated through legitimacy, collaboration, and adaptability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pblplcpwinfdsmk-06
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Nonprofit Influence in Public Policy

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Barriers to Nonprofit Influence in Public Policy

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Although nonprofit organisations have become increasingly visible in governance and policy debates, their influence is often constrained by structural, political, and organisational barriers. This article identifies six interrelated obstacles: limited resources and donor dependency, restrictive regulations, shrinking civic space, internal tensions between professionalisation and grassroots legitimacy, fragmentation within civil society, and systemic power asymmetries relative to governments and corporations. These constraints shape not only the scope but also the sustainability of advocacy. Drawing on global evidence, the article shows that nonprofit power is relational and contingent on institutional and political environments. For scholars, it advances a structural understanding of advocacy limitations; for practitioners, it provides strategies for resilience—diversifying funding, strengthening coalitions, and balancing accountability to both donors and communities. Ultimately, it argues that nonprofit influence cannot be assumed even in democratic settings and must be continuously negotiated through legitimacy, collaboration, and adaptability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Barriers to Nonprofit Influence in Public Policy — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS