Legitimacy and Policy Engagement of Nonprofit Organisations

The legitimacy of nonprofit organisations in policy engagement remains a central and contested issue in global governance. NGOs frequently claim moral and representational authority despite lacking formal democratic mandates, leading to persistent debates about accountability, autonomy, and representation. This article examines how legitimacy is constructed and challenged through donor relations, service delivery, advocacy practices, and accountability frameworks. Drawing on theoretical models of pragmatic, moral, and cognitive legitimacy, it argues that credibility is dynamic—earned through participation, transparency, and community trust rather than formal authority. Donor dependency and professionalisation can enhance credibility but risk eroding grassroots legitimacy, while participatory accountability mechanisms strengthen authenticity and resilience. For scholars, legitimacy provides a conceptual anchor for understanding the evolving role of civil society in governance; for practitioners, it highlights the need for diversified funding, participatory engagement, and advocacy grounded in lived experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pblplcpwinfdsmk-07
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimacy and Policy Engagement of Nonprofit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Legitimacy and Policy Engagement of Nonprofit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

The legitimacy of nonprofit organisations in policy engagement remains a central and contested issue in global governance. NGOs frequently claim moral and representational authority despite lacking formal democratic mandates, leading to persistent debates about accountability, autonomy, and representation. This article examines how legitimacy is constructed and challenged through donor relations, service delivery, advocacy practices, and accountability frameworks. Drawing on theoretical models of pragmatic, moral, and cognitive legitimacy, it argues that credibility is dynamic—earned through participation, transparency, and community trust rather than formal authority. Donor dependency and professionalisation can enhance credibility but risk eroding grassroots legitimacy, while participatory accountability mechanisms strengthen authenticity and resilience. For scholars, legitimacy provides a conceptual anchor for understanding the evolving role of civil society in governance; for practitioners, it highlights the need for diversified funding, participatory engagement, and advocacy grounded in lived experience.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.