Organisational Structures and Mechanisms of Change in Non-Profit Organisations

This article analyses how organisational structures shape the mechanisms of social change in non-profit organisations. It argues that institutional design—encompassing governance, coalitions, alliances, and decision-making systems—acts as both an enabler and a constraint of NGO influence. Grassroots organisations derive legitimacy from participation and cultural embeddedness, while international NGOs achieve visibility through professionalisation and scale. Governance models expose enduring tensions between donor-driven upward accountability and community-based downward accountability, while coalitions and alliances expand reach but risk power asymmetries and co-optation. The hierarchy–horizontalism debate highlights structural trade-offs between efficiency, participation, and legitimacy. By framing structures as dynamic systems rather than static frameworks, the article situates organisational form at the centre of understanding how NGOs mobilise influence and sustain democratic values in complex institutional environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-hworgbrchmchscimp-05
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organisational Structures and Mechanisms of Change in Non-Profit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Organisational Structures and Mechanisms of Change in Non-Profit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

This article analyses how organisational structures shape the mechanisms of social change in non-profit organisations. It argues that institutional design—encompassing governance, coalitions, alliances, and decision-making systems—acts as both an enabler and a constraint of NGO influence. Grassroots organisations derive legitimacy from participation and cultural embeddedness, while international NGOs achieve visibility through professionalisation and scale. Governance models expose enduring tensions between donor-driven upward accountability and community-based downward accountability, while coalitions and alliances expand reach but risk power asymmetries and co-optation. The hierarchy–horizontalism debate highlights structural trade-offs between efficiency, participation, and legitimacy. By framing structures as dynamic systems rather than static frameworks, the article situates organisational form at the centre of understanding how NGOs mobilise influence and sustain democratic values in complex institutional environments.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.