Designing online forums to support health and wellbeing: guidance informed by self-determination theory and stakeholder perspectives (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The use of online forums to support health and wellbeing is widespread and growing, yet evidence of their safety and effectiveness is mixed. The absence of theory-informed guidance on how to design these forums, considering the expertise of forum users and moderators, is a barrier to improving outcomes. The development of evidence-based forum design guidance grounded in theory and lived experience could improve the efficacy and outcomes of these forums for the many people using them worldwide. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To draw on the experience and expertise of online forum users and staff, together with insights from existing research on wellbeing-supportive design and self-determination theory, to generate a set of theoretically grounded and evidence-based design guidelines for safe, healthy and well-being supportive online forums. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We conducted 52 semi-structured interviews with 36 forum users,18 with forum staff, and four design workshops with forum staff. We combined these with input from a multidisciplinary research team with expertise in forum delivery and evaluation. Principles of qualitative framework analysis were used to adapt a pre-existing framework for designing well-being supportive technology to the context of online health forums. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The resulting design guidelines for wellbeing supportive forum design are framed around four overarching principles relating to the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as defined by self-determination theory, and the additional need for safety in online forums. Each principle is provided with a series of pragmatic design heuristics and specific strategies that designers can use to promote the satisfaction of psychological needs in user experience and prevent harm. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> User experience of online health forums shows that there is room for improvement with regard to how well these forums support basic psychological needs and safety. We have drawn on self-determination theory to respond to these findings by proposing a set of evidence-based guidelines for service development and refinement of online health forums. The guidance can be readily adapted to specific user groups across the diverse settings in which forums are hosted. </sec> <sec> <title>INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT</title> RR2-https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142 </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85411
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing online forums to support health and wellbeing: guidance informed by self-determination theory and stakeholder perspectives (Preprint)

Rachel Meacock, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Christopher Lodge, Dorian Peters et al.
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Designing online forums to support health and wellbeing: guidance informed by self-determination theory and stakeholder perspectives (Preprint)

Rachel Meacock, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Christopher Lodge, Dorian Peters, Louisa Salhi, Paul Rayson, Fiona Lobban, Zoe Glossop, Anna Čermáková, Heather Robinson, Karen Machin, Jade Haines, Paul Marshall, Steven Jones, Jay Staff, Neil Caton, Bohdana Dock
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The use of online forums to support health and wellbeing is widespread and growing, yet evidence of their safety and effectiveness is mixed. The absence of theory-informed guidance on how to design these forums, considering the expertise of forum users and moderators, is a barrier to improving outcomes. The development of evidence-based forum design guidance grounded in theory and lived experience could improve the efficacy and outcomes of these forums for the many people using them worldwide. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To draw on the experience and expertise of online forum users and staff, together with insights from existing research on wellbeing-supportive design and self-determination theory, to generate a set of theoretically grounded and evidence-based design guidelines for safe, healthy and well-being supportive online forums. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We conducted 52 semi-structured interviews with 36 forum users,18 with forum staff, and four design workshops with forum staff. We combined these with input from a multidisciplinary research team with expertise in forum delivery and evaluation. Principles of qualitative framework analysis were used to adapt a pre-existing framework for designing well-being supportive technology to the context of online health forums. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The resulting design guidelines for wellbeing supportive forum design are framed around four overarching principles relating to the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as defined by self-determination theory, and the additional need for safety in online forums. Each principle is provided with a series of pragmatic design heuristics and specific strategies that designers can use to promote the satisfaction of psychological needs in user experience and prevent harm. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> User experience of online health forums shows that there is room for improvement with regard to how well these forums support basic psychological needs and safety. We have drawn on self-determination theory to respond to these findings by proposing a set of evidence-based guidelines for service development and refinement of online health forums. The guidance can be readily adapted to specific user groups across the diverse settings in which forums are hosted. </sec> <sec> <title>INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT</title> RR2-https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142 </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.