Dimensions of Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations

Accountability in non-profit organisations manifests across multiple dimensions that reflect complex relationships with diverse stakeholders. This article analyses four principal forms of accountability: upward (to donors, regulators, and governments), downward (to communities and beneficiaries), internal (to boards, leaders, and staff), and lateral (to peer organisations and coalitions). Each dimension embodies distinct mechanisms, opportunities, and power dynamics. Upward accountability enhances transparency but risks donor dominance; downward accountability promotes participation but remains underdeveloped; internal accountability ensures governance integrity; and lateral accountability fosters peer learning and sectoral standards. Drawing on comparative evidence, the article demonstrates that accountability frameworks are context-sensitive, shaped by regional and sectoral variations. It concludes that sustainable legitimacy depends on integrating these dimensions into a coherent system that balances compliance and empowerment, oversight and trust, and global standards with local realities.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-03
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Dimensions of Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Accountability in non-profit organisations manifests across multiple dimensions that reflect complex relationships with diverse stakeholders. This article analyses four principal forms of accountability: upward (to donors, regulators, and governments), downward (to communities and beneficiaries), internal (to boards, leaders, and staff), and lateral (to peer organisations and coalitions). Each dimension embodies distinct mechanisms, opportunities, and power dynamics. Upward accountability enhances transparency but risks donor dominance; downward accountability promotes participation but remains underdeveloped; internal accountability ensures governance integrity; and lateral accountability fosters peer learning and sectoral standards. Drawing on comparative evidence, the article demonstrates that accountability frameworks are context-sensitive, shaped by regional and sectoral variations. It concludes that sustainable legitimacy depends on integrating these dimensions into a coherent system that balances compliance and empowerment, oversight and trust, and global standards with local realities.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dimensions of Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS