Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations: Compliance, Ethics, and Power

Accountability constitutes one of the most contested yet essential dimensions of legitimacy within the non-profit sector. Unlike private firms and state agencies, non-profits operate in an environment characterised by multiple stakeholders, diffuse expectations, and heightened vulnerability to reputational risk. This article examines accountability not only as an instrumental mechanism for compliance but also as an intrinsic ethical commitment. Drawing on governance and public administration theories—including principal–agent, stewardship, stakeholder, and legitimacy perspectives—the analysis demonstrates that accountability is best understood as a dynamic negotiation of power between donors, governments, beneficiaries, and communities. The article further considers how crises of trust and high-profile scandals have exposed the limitations of compliance-based models, reinforcing the need for participatory and rights-based approaches that privilege downward accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-01
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations: Compliance, Ethics, and Power

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Accountability in Non-Profit Organisations: Compliance, Ethics, and Power

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Accountability constitutes one of the most contested yet essential dimensions of legitimacy within the non-profit sector. Unlike private firms and state agencies, non-profits operate in an environment characterised by multiple stakeholders, diffuse expectations, and heightened vulnerability to reputational risk. This article examines accountability not only as an instrumental mechanism for compliance but also as an intrinsic ethical commitment. Drawing on governance and public administration theories—including principal–agent, stewardship, stakeholder, and legitimacy perspectives—the analysis demonstrates that accountability is best understood as a dynamic negotiation of power between donors, governments, beneficiaries, and communities. The article further considers how crises of trust and high-profile scandals have exposed the limitations of compliance-based models, reinforcing the need for participatory and rights-based approaches that privilege downward accountability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.