What Sets the Metallicity of Ultra-Faint Dwarfs?

We use intergalactic medium (IGM) metallicity distributions from several state-of-the-art cosmological simulations of Milky Way analogs and a semi-analytic model of ultra-faint dwarf galaxy (UFD) formation to model the stellar metallicities of UFDs in MW-like environments. We study simulations with different treatments of star formation, stellar feedback, and Population III enrichment, and in all cases, we find that only a few percent of the IGM accretable by UFD progenitors is enriched to metallicities . When the metallicity of accreted IGM in the semi-analytic galaxy formation model is set using these IGM metallicity distributions, the model underpredicts UFD metallicities and their scatter compared to the observed luminosity–metallicity relation. Our results indicate that IGM enrichment is not the dominant mechanism setting metallicities of UFD stars. Instead, UFD stellar metallicity is determined primarily by the interplay between internal enrichment and metal loss through feedback-driven outflows. We examine models with different values of the maximum outflow mass loading factor and show that the full range of average stellar metallicities of UFDs at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> can be reproduced if the maximum mass loading factor varies in the range . We also consider stellar metallicity distribution functions (MDFs) within individual model galaxies with different assumptions about IGM enrichment and . We find that all considered models are in reasonable agreement with observed UFD MDFs, with model differences less than the uncertainties of current metallicity measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.145734
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Sets the Metallicity of Ultra-Faint Dwarfs?

Vadim A. Semenov, Harley Katz, Andrey V. Kravtsov, Anirudh Chiti et al.
1 citations
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
0.52
article

What Sets the Metallicity of Ultra-Faint Dwarfs?

Vadim A. Semenov, Harley Katz, Andrey V. Kravtsov, Anirudh Chiti, Vance Wheeler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We use intergalactic medium (IGM) metallicity distributions from several state-of-the-art cosmological simulations of Milky Way analogs and a semi-analytic model of ultra-faint dwarf galaxy (UFD) formation to model the stellar metallicities of UFDs in MW-like environments. We study simulations with different treatments of star formation, stellar feedback, and Population III enrichment, and in all cases, we find that only a few percent of the IGM accretable by UFD progenitors is enriched to metallicities . When the metallicity of accreted IGM in the semi-analytic galaxy formation model is set using these IGM metallicity distributions, the model underpredicts UFD metallicities and their scatter compared to the observed luminosity–metallicity relation. Our results indicate that IGM enrichment is not the dominant mechanism setting metallicities of UFD stars. Instead, UFD stellar metallicity is determined primarily by the interplay between internal enrichment and metal loss through feedback-driven outflows. We examine models with different values of the maximum outflow mass loading factor and show that the full range of average stellar metallicities of UFDs at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> can be reproduced if the maximum mass loading factor varies in the range . We also consider stellar metallicity distribution functions (MDFs) within individual model galaxies with different assumptions about IGM enrichment and . We find that all considered models are in reasonable agreement with observed UFD MDFs, with model differences less than the uncertainties of current metallicity measurements.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 8
University of Chicago (US), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.