Measuring Resilience in Non-Profit Organisations: Tools, Approaches, and Challenges

Measuring resilience in non-profit organisations is vital for translating an abstract concept into actionable strategies for sustainability and adaptive learning. This article reviews the principal tools, frameworks, and methodological challenges associated with resilience measurement at both individual and organisational levels. Psychological instruments such as the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) capture personal adaptability and recovery capacities, while organisational indicators assess flexibility, redundancy, governance quality, and learning systems. Complementary qualitative and participatory methods illuminate cultural and relational dimensions often excluded from quantitative metrics. The article advocates for mixed-method approaches that integrate scales, indicators, and narratives to achieve comprehensive, context-sensitive insight—particularly in cross-cultural environments. It concludes that resilience measurement should serve as a mechanism for empowerment and organisational learning, rather than a purely technical exercise, aligning evaluation with the non-profit sector’s ethical, participatory, and mission-driven ethos.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-rslpsstrldtm-07
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Resilience in Non-Profit Organisations: Tools, Approaches, and Challenges

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Measuring Resilience in Non-Profit Organisations: Tools, Approaches, and Challenges

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Measuring resilience in non-profit organisations is vital for translating an abstract concept into actionable strategies for sustainability and adaptive learning. This article reviews the principal tools, frameworks, and methodological challenges associated with resilience measurement at both individual and organisational levels. Psychological instruments such as the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) capture personal adaptability and recovery capacities, while organisational indicators assess flexibility, redundancy, governance quality, and learning systems. Complementary qualitative and participatory methods illuminate cultural and relational dimensions often excluded from quantitative metrics. The article advocates for mixed-method approaches that integrate scales, indicators, and narratives to achieve comprehensive, context-sensitive insight—particularly in cross-cultural environments. It concludes that resilience measurement should serve as a mechanism for empowerment and organisational learning, rather than a purely technical exercise, aligning evaluation with the non-profit sector’s ethical, participatory, and mission-driven ethos.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring Resilience in Non-Profit Organisations: Tools, Approaches, and Challenges — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS