The Future of Non-Profit Legitimacy: Synthesis and Emerging Directions

Legitimacy remains the cornerstone of non-profit credibility, sustainability, and influence. This article synthesises theoretical, empirical, and practical perspectives on legitimacy, consolidating insights from across the field into a cohesive framework. It identifies legitimacy as a multidimensional construct—pragmatic, moral, cognitive, representational, and epistemic—while emphasising its contested and dynamic character. The synthesis integrates findings on its sources (legal, moral, epistemic, participatory), vulnerabilities (scandals, foreign influence, corporatisation, weak grassroots ties), and strategies for resilience (participatory governance, ethical culture, adaptive management, and crisis communication). Measurement challenges are addressed through methodological pluralism, acknowledging legitimacy’s perceptual and relational foundations. Looking ahead, digital transformation, populist backlash, and decolonial critique are reshaping legitimacy’s meaning and mechanisms, shifting authority from external validation toward locally grounded and digitally adaptive forms. The article concludes that legitimacy is both a condition for organisational survival and a driver of systemic change, demanding continuous negotiation, critical reflection, and innovation from scholars and practitioners alike.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-orglgernsustpbltrst-10
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Non-Profit Legitimacy: Synthesis and Emerging Directions

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The Future of Non-Profit Legitimacy: Synthesis and Emerging Directions

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Legitimacy remains the cornerstone of non-profit credibility, sustainability, and influence. This article synthesises theoretical, empirical, and practical perspectives on legitimacy, consolidating insights from across the field into a cohesive framework. It identifies legitimacy as a multidimensional construct—pragmatic, moral, cognitive, representational, and epistemic—while emphasising its contested and dynamic character. The synthesis integrates findings on its sources (legal, moral, epistemic, participatory), vulnerabilities (scandals, foreign influence, corporatisation, weak grassroots ties), and strategies for resilience (participatory governance, ethical culture, adaptive management, and crisis communication). Measurement challenges are addressed through methodological pluralism, acknowledging legitimacy’s perceptual and relational foundations. Looking ahead, digital transformation, populist backlash, and decolonial critique are reshaping legitimacy’s meaning and mechanisms, shifting authority from external validation toward locally grounded and digitally adaptive forms. The article concludes that legitimacy is both a condition for organisational survival and a driver of systemic change, demanding continuous negotiation, critical reflection, and innovation from scholars and practitioners alike.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.