Building Individual Resilience in Non-Profit Leaders and Staff

Resilience among non-profit leaders and staff is a cornerstone of organisational sustainability, psychological well-being, and mission integrity. This article conceptualises resilience as a multidimensional construct shaped by coping strategies, psychological resources, and organisational conditions. Using the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model, it analyses how resilience depends on balancing emotional and ethical demands with adequate supports such as autonomy, social connection, and professional development. Individual strategies like mindfulness, boundary-setting, and reflective practice form the behavioural base for adaptability, while psychological resources such as self-efficacy and optimism reinforce long-term engagement. Yet, the article critiques the overemphasis on personal responsibility, warning against “toxic positivity” that masks systemic inequities and leadership failures. A sustainable resilience framework, it argues, must integrate individual empowerment with organisational accountability—embedding well-being into governance, policy, and culture to ensure lasting mission performance in complex environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-rslpsstrldtm-04
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Individual Resilience in Non-Profit Leaders and Staff

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Building Individual Resilience in Non-Profit Leaders and Staff

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Resilience among non-profit leaders and staff is a cornerstone of organisational sustainability, psychological well-being, and mission integrity. This article conceptualises resilience as a multidimensional construct shaped by coping strategies, psychological resources, and organisational conditions. Using the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model, it analyses how resilience depends on balancing emotional and ethical demands with adequate supports such as autonomy, social connection, and professional development. Individual strategies like mindfulness, boundary-setting, and reflective practice form the behavioural base for adaptability, while psychological resources such as self-efficacy and optimism reinforce long-term engagement. Yet, the article critiques the overemphasis on personal responsibility, warning against “toxic positivity” that masks systemic inequities and leadership failures. A sustainable resilience framework, it argues, must integrate individual empowerment with organisational accountability—embedding well-being into governance, policy, and culture to ensure lasting mission performance in complex environments.

Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.