The Myanmar Military's Language of Security and Its Implications for Regional Diplomacy

ABSTRACT On February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military deposed the democratically elected government in a coup. The coup affected Myanmar's interactions with external interlocutors, bringing the country's security and stability into focus. The military's response to and framing of the resistance movement that emerged postcoup have affected interlocutors' attempts to resolve the crisis; collective efforts differ from individual interests. The Myanmar junta's narratives assert that it is the “guardian of the state” and blame the various ethnic armed organisations and resistance forces for disrupting stability. This paper examines a recurring reality in Myanmar: the military uses security narratives to justify its acts as being in the state's interests, while securing its survival. Such security speech acts invoke the military's guardian role, securitise the Rohingya issue, and also use security as a reason for the 2021 coup. The military's security language has deepened the divide in the country and hampered regional diplomacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Politics & Policy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70049
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Myanmar Military's Language of Security and Its Implications for Regional Diplomacy

Moe Thuzar
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

The Myanmar Military's Language of Security and Its Implications for Regional Diplomacy

Moe Thuzar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT On February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military deposed the democratically elected government in a coup. The coup affected Myanmar's interactions with external interlocutors, bringing the country's security and stability into focus. The military's response to and framing of the resistance movement that emerged postcoup have affected interlocutors' attempts to resolve the crisis; collective efforts differ from individual interests. The Myanmar junta's narratives assert that it is the “guardian of the state” and blame the various ethnic armed organisations and resistance forces for disrupting stability. This paper examines a recurring reality in Myanmar: the military uses security narratives to justify its acts as being in the state's interests, while securing its survival. Such security speech acts invoke the military's guardian role, securitise the Rohingya issue, and also use security as a reason for the 2021 coup. The military's security language has deepened the divide in the country and hampered regional diplomacy.

Asian Politics & PolicyVol. 17(4)
ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.