Exploring regulatory capabilities for design for safety in construction: the case of Malaysia

Purpose Despite numerous efforts to examine the Design for Safety (DfS) capabilities of different duty holders, understanding regulatory capabilities has remained limited. This study aims to identify the regulatory DfS capabilities for regulatory organizations in Malaysia to enhance enforcement effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative research methodology was adopted using a structured questionnaire informed by literature and expert validation. Data were collected via face-to-face surveys with 91 stakeholders during 14 engagement sessions using purposive sampling. Responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, along with content analysis of open-ended responses to identify key capabilities for effective DfS regulatory implementation in Malaysia’s construction sector. Findings Analysis of the survey data showed that the five most important DfS regulatory capabilities are competence-based capabilities (i.e. knowledge and skills) and strategy-based capabilities (i.e. resilience, top management commitment and funding allocation). Furthermore, the findings suggest that the continuous improvement of DfS practices relies on six key drivers: leadership and commitment, capacity building and duty holder training, technological advancements and integration, regulatory framework and compliance, stakeholder engagement and collaboration and financial and resource allocation. Practical implications The identified regulatory capabilities will facilitate regulatory organizations to enforce the DfS legislation, e.g. Occupational Safety and Health (Construction Work) (Design and Management) Regulations 2024, effectively. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing DfS literature by providing the first empirical evidence on regulatory DfS capabilities in construction, thereby facilitating the diffusion of DfS practices within enforcement and beyond, particularly in the context of developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-03-2025-0077
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring regulatory capabilities for design for safety in construction: the case of Malaysia

Sheila Belayutham, Patrick Manu, Clara Cheung, Che Khairil Izam Che Ibrahim et al.
1 citations
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Exploring regulatory capabilities for design for safety in construction: the case of Malaysia

Sheila Belayutham, Patrick Manu, Clara Cheung, Che Khairil Izam Che Ibrahim, Azman Hussain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Despite numerous efforts to examine the Design for Safety (DfS) capabilities of different duty holders, understanding regulatory capabilities has remained limited. This study aims to identify the regulatory DfS capabilities for regulatory organizations in Malaysia to enhance enforcement effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative research methodology was adopted using a structured questionnaire informed by literature and expert validation. Data were collected via face-to-face surveys with 91 stakeholders during 14 engagement sessions using purposive sampling. Responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, along with content analysis of open-ended responses to identify key capabilities for effective DfS regulatory implementation in Malaysia’s construction sector. Findings Analysis of the survey data showed that the five most important DfS regulatory capabilities are competence-based capabilities (i.e. knowledge and skills) and strategy-based capabilities (i.e. resilience, top management commitment and funding allocation). Furthermore, the findings suggest that the continuous improvement of DfS practices relies on six key drivers: leadership and commitment, capacity building and duty holder training, technological advancements and integration, regulatory framework and compliance, stakeholder engagement and collaboration and financial and resource allocation. Practical implications The identified regulatory capabilities will facilitate regulatory organizations to enforce the DfS legislation, e.g. Occupational Safety and Health (Construction Work) (Design and Management) Regulations 2024, effectively. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing DfS literature by providing the first empirical evidence on regulatory DfS capabilities in construction, thereby facilitating the diffusion of DfS practices within enforcement and beyond, particularly in the context of developing countries.

Built Environment Project and Asset ManagementVol. 16(2)
University of the West of England (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester School of Architecture (GB), Ministry of Health (SI), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.