Challenges to Grassroots Leadership: Autonomy, Power, and Vulnerability

This article examines the structural and relational challenges confronting grassroots leadership in non-profit and community development contexts. It highlights how external pressures—such as donor dependency, NGO asymmetries, and political co-optation—interact with internal community divisions and social hierarchies to undermine autonomy and sustainability. The analysis exposes how accountability frameworks often privilege measurable outputs over relational processes, marginalizing community agency. Additional threats include security risks, repression, and the tokenization of grassroots participation. Drawing on examples of land defenders, women’s activists, and Indigenous leaders, the article argues that grassroots leadership is neither inherently democratic nor secure but continually negotiated within systems of power and vulnerability. It concludes that sustaining authentic grassroots leadership requires strategies of protection, financial independence, inclusivity, and solidarity to preserve autonomy while engaging with institutional systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-grsrldemplcvc-06
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges to Grassroots Leadership: Autonomy, Power, and Vulnerability

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

Challenges to Grassroots Leadership: Autonomy, Power, and Vulnerability

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

This article examines the structural and relational challenges confronting grassroots leadership in non-profit and community development contexts. It highlights how external pressures—such as donor dependency, NGO asymmetries, and political co-optation—interact with internal community divisions and social hierarchies to undermine autonomy and sustainability. The analysis exposes how accountability frameworks often privilege measurable outputs over relational processes, marginalizing community agency. Additional threats include security risks, repression, and the tokenization of grassroots participation. Drawing on examples of land defenders, women’s activists, and Indigenous leaders, the article argues that grassroots leadership is neither inherently democratic nor secure but continually negotiated within systems of power and vulnerability. It concludes that sustaining authentic grassroots leadership requires strategies of protection, financial independence, inclusivity, and solidarity to preserve autonomy while engaging with institutional systems.

Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges to Grassroots Leadership: Autonomy, Power, and Vulnerability — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS