Building Grassroots Leadership Capacity: Dialogical Learning, Empowerment, and Dual Legitimacy

This article explores strategies for building grassroots leadership capacity through dialogical learning, collective empowerment, and sustained community legitimacy. It critiques conventional training models that prioritize donor-driven technical skills over cultural knowledge and relational accountability. Drawing on Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed and peer learning traditions, it argues that effective capacity-building must integrate experiential learning, reflection, and collective praxis. The discussion highlights the importance of inclusivity, addressing barriers linked to gender, class, ethnicity, and generational hierarchies. It also examines the paradox of dual legitimacy—where institutional recognition can both empower leaders and erode their local trust. Examples from women’s cooperatives, diaspora networks, and youth movements illustrate how participatory learning can reinforce both autonomy and institutional engagement. Ultimately, the article calls for leadership development frameworks that safeguard community accountability while enabling grassroots actors to engage effectively with global systems of governance and advocacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-grsrldemplcvc-04
Primary Topic
Organizational Learning and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Grassroots Leadership Capacity: Dialogical Learning, Empowerment, and Dual Legitimacy

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Organizational Learning and Leadership
article

Building Grassroots Leadership Capacity: Dialogical Learning, Empowerment, and Dual Legitimacy

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

This article explores strategies for building grassroots leadership capacity through dialogical learning, collective empowerment, and sustained community legitimacy. It critiques conventional training models that prioritize donor-driven technical skills over cultural knowledge and relational accountability. Drawing on Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed and peer learning traditions, it argues that effective capacity-building must integrate experiential learning, reflection, and collective praxis. The discussion highlights the importance of inclusivity, addressing barriers linked to gender, class, ethnicity, and generational hierarchies. It also examines the paradox of dual legitimacy—where institutional recognition can both empower leaders and erode their local trust. Examples from women’s cooperatives, diaspora networks, and youth movements illustrate how participatory learning can reinforce both autonomy and institutional engagement. Ultimately, the article calls for leadership development frameworks that safeguard community accountability while enabling grassroots actors to engage effectively with global systems of governance and advocacy.

Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Organizational Learning and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Building Grassroots Leadership Capacity: Dialogical Learning, Empowerment, and Dual Legitimacy — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS