Evaluating the sustainability reporting of oil and gas companies in post-conflict regions: the case of Kurdistan

Purpose This study evaluates the sustainability reporting of oil and gas companies in discharging accountability to powerless stakeholders in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI), a post-conflict region in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Design/methodology/approach The study draws on stakeholder theory and adopts an interpretivist approach. Data comprise 21 semi-structured interviews with citizens, tribal leaders, Mukhtars, and local workers, alongside seven sustainability reports, published in 2023, by foreign oil companies operating in the KRI. The interview data are thematically analysed, while reports are assessed using a disclosure quality index and word count. Findings Post-2007 oil-led economic reforms were intended to bring prosperity to a post-conflict region but have instead resulted in social, economic, and environmental costs. Weak institutional oversight allows local and foreign oil companies (LOCs and FOCs, respectively) to prioritise economic interests over the sustainability concerns of powerless stakeholders. LOCs fail to engage in sustainability reporting, while FOCs conduct minimal, if any, local stakeholder engagement; their reports lack relevance to KRI-specific issues, highlighting an accountability gap and growing frustration among local stakeholders. Practical implications Policymakers and regulators should mandate sustainability reporting that ensures alignment with high-quality international standards and better reflects local sustainability needs. Standard-setters, such as the GRI and the ISSB, should consider issuing guidelines to ensure that sustainability reports address local stakeholder concerns. Practitioners, including sustainability report preparers and assurance professionals, should ensure that the voices and concerns of powerless stakeholders are reflected in sustainability disclosures. Originality/value This research extends previous studies by examining sustainability reporting in a post-conflict region, MENA, which has been less documented in the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-08-2024-0382
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the sustainability reporting of oil and gas companies in post-conflict regions: the case of Kurdistan

Muhammad Bilal Farooq, Ibrahim Mustafa Khudir, Mahmood Ahmed Momin, Asheq Rahman
Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

Evaluating the sustainability reporting of oil and gas companies in post-conflict regions: the case of Kurdistan

Muhammad Bilal Farooq, Ibrahim Mustafa Khudir, Mahmood Ahmed Momin, Asheq Rahman
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates the sustainability reporting of oil and gas companies in discharging accountability to powerless stakeholders in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI), a post-conflict region in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Design/methodology/approach The study draws on stakeholder theory and adopts an interpretivist approach. Data comprise 21 semi-structured interviews with citizens, tribal leaders, Mukhtars, and local workers, alongside seven sustainability reports, published in 2023, by foreign oil companies operating in the KRI. The interview data are thematically analysed, while reports are assessed using a disclosure quality index and word count. Findings Post-2007 oil-led economic reforms were intended to bring prosperity to a post-conflict region but have instead resulted in social, economic, and environmental costs. Weak institutional oversight allows local and foreign oil companies (LOCs and FOCs, respectively) to prioritise economic interests over the sustainability concerns of powerless stakeholders. LOCs fail to engage in sustainability reporting, while FOCs conduct minimal, if any, local stakeholder engagement; their reports lack relevance to KRI-specific issues, highlighting an accountability gap and growing frustration among local stakeholders. Practical implications Policymakers and regulators should mandate sustainability reporting that ensures alignment with high-quality international standards and better reflects local sustainability needs. Standard-setters, such as the GRI and the ISSB, should consider issuing guidelines to ensure that sustainability reports address local stakeholder concerns. Practitioners, including sustainability report preparers and assurance professionals, should ensure that the voices and concerns of powerless stakeholders are reflected in sustainability disclosures. Originality/value This research extends previous studies by examining sustainability reporting in a post-conflict region, MENA, which has been less documented in the literature.

Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies
United Arab Emirates University (AE), Soran University (IQ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.