Tensions and Conflicts in Non-Profit Governance

Board–executive relations in non-profit organizations are inherently dynamic yet susceptible to tension and conflict. This article explores the structural, cultural, and interpersonal dimensions of governance conflict, identifying key sources such as role ambiguity, value clashes, identity gaps, and power struggles. Drawing on case studies from the humanitarian and development sectors, it demonstrates how unresolved tensions can evolve into crises that damage legitimacy and stakeholder trust. However, conflict is not inherently destructive: when recognized and managed constructively, it can lead to greater clarity, accountability, and resilience. The analysis integrates theoretical insights from organizational behavior, governance studies, and ethics, arguing that effective governance requires both structural safeguards and relational trust. For scholars, it advances a relational understanding of governance beyond formal compliance; for practitioners, it offers guidance on managing tensions through communication, mutual respect, and clear role definition.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-brdexcrel-05
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tensions and Conflicts in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Tensions and Conflicts in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Board–executive relations in non-profit organizations are inherently dynamic yet susceptible to tension and conflict. This article explores the structural, cultural, and interpersonal dimensions of governance conflict, identifying key sources such as role ambiguity, value clashes, identity gaps, and power struggles. Drawing on case studies from the humanitarian and development sectors, it demonstrates how unresolved tensions can evolve into crises that damage legitimacy and stakeholder trust. However, conflict is not inherently destructive: when recognized and managed constructively, it can lead to greater clarity, accountability, and resilience. The analysis integrates theoretical insights from organizational behavior, governance studies, and ethics, arguing that effective governance requires both structural safeguards and relational trust. For scholars, it advances a relational understanding of governance beyond formal compliance; for practitioners, it offers guidance on managing tensions through communication, mutual respect, and clear role definition.

Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tensions and Conflicts in Non-Profit Governance — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS