Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments

Over the past decade, civic space has contracted worldwide, constraining the capacity of civil society organizations (CSOs) and non-profits to operate freely. This article examines how these actors adapt to restrictive legal, political, cultural, and digital contexts. Drawing on comparative politics and civil society studies, it situates shrinking civic space within the frameworks of authoritarian resilience and democratic backsliding. Through analysis of Russia’s “foreign agents” law, China’s Overseas NGO Law, and cases from Africa and Asia, the article identifies adaptive strategies such as legal restructuring, digital security innovation, and transnational collaboration. It argues that while restrictive regimes suppress formal activism, they also drive organizational creativity and informal resilience. The findings provide critical insights for scholars, donors, and practitioners seeking to support civil society without exacerbating risk, emphasizing that repressive environments can simultaneously serve as sites of repression and of social innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-01
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Over the past decade, civic space has contracted worldwide, constraining the capacity of civil society organizations (CSOs) and non-profits to operate freely. This article examines how these actors adapt to restrictive legal, political, cultural, and digital contexts. Drawing on comparative politics and civil society studies, it situates shrinking civic space within the frameworks of authoritarian resilience and democratic backsliding. Through analysis of Russia’s “foreign agents” law, China’s Overseas NGO Law, and cases from Africa and Asia, the article identifies adaptive strategies such as legal restructuring, digital security innovation, and transnational collaboration. It argues that while restrictive regimes suppress formal activism, they also drive organizational creativity and informal resilience. The findings provide critical insights for scholars, donors, and practitioners seeking to support civil society without exacerbating risk, emphasizing that repressive environments can simultaneously serve as sites of repression and of social innovation.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS