Board–Executive Relations in Non-Profit Governance

The relationship between boards and executives lies at the heart of non-profit governance, determining how accountability, legitimacy, and performance are achieved. Rather than a static hierarchy, governance operates as a dynamic interaction between fiduciary oversight and executive leadership. This article examines key theoretical perspectives—agency, stewardship, stakeholder, and institutional theories—to illuminate how power and trust are balanced in practice. It contrasts non-profit governance with corporate and public-sector models, showing that non-profits must reconcile multiple stakeholder expectations without profit benchmarks. Drawing on comparative literature, the article argues that governance effectiveness depends not on rigid structures but on the quality of collaboration and contextual alignment between boards and executives. Strong board–executive partnerships enhance adaptability, transparency, and strategic coherence, while dysfunction risks mission drift or loss of legitimacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-brdexcrel-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board–Executive Relations in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Board–Executive Relations in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

The relationship between boards and executives lies at the heart of non-profit governance, determining how accountability, legitimacy, and performance are achieved. Rather than a static hierarchy, governance operates as a dynamic interaction between fiduciary oversight and executive leadership. This article examines key theoretical perspectives—agency, stewardship, stakeholder, and institutional theories—to illuminate how power and trust are balanced in practice. It contrasts non-profit governance with corporate and public-sector models, showing that non-profits must reconcile multiple stakeholder expectations without profit benchmarks. Drawing on comparative literature, the article argues that governance effectiveness depends not on rigid structures but on the quality of collaboration and contextual alignment between boards and executives. Strong board–executive partnerships enhance adaptability, transparency, and strategic coherence, while dysfunction risks mission drift or loss of legitimacy.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.