The Role of the Board in Non-Profit Governance

Boards of directors stand at the core of non-profit governance, balancing fiduciary responsibility, strategic direction, and stakeholder accountability. Unlike corporate boards accountable primarily to shareholders, non-profit boards operate in complex environments involving donors, beneficiaries, regulators, and the public. This article examines the multifaceted role of boards across fiduciary, strategic, and cultural domains, showing how duties of care, loyalty, and obedience intersect with strategic oversight and contextual legitimacy. It highlights that board effectiveness depends not on formal structures alone but on engagement, independence, and adaptability. Comparative perspectives illustrate how governance codes and cultural traditions shape board practice globally. By integrating legal, strategic, and sociocultural perspectives, the article underscores that effective boards act not only as oversight bodies but as active partners in advancing mission integrity, innovation, and organizational trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-brdexcrel-03
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of the Board in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The Role of the Board in Non-Profit Governance

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Boards of directors stand at the core of non-profit governance, balancing fiduciary responsibility, strategic direction, and stakeholder accountability. Unlike corporate boards accountable primarily to shareholders, non-profit boards operate in complex environments involving donors, beneficiaries, regulators, and the public. This article examines the multifaceted role of boards across fiduciary, strategic, and cultural domains, showing how duties of care, loyalty, and obedience intersect with strategic oversight and contextual legitimacy. It highlights that board effectiveness depends not on formal structures alone but on engagement, independence, and adaptability. Comparative perspectives illustrate how governance codes and cultural traditions shape board practice globally. By integrating legal, strategic, and sociocultural perspectives, the article underscores that effective boards act not only as oversight bodies but as active partners in advancing mission integrity, innovation, and organizational trust.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.