BEST OF SAGEEP: Impacts of Latency on Temsense One-pass Classification Results

Summary Latency corrections are key to producing accurate inversion results from AGC data. Visual inspection of response peaks in IVS data may not be sufficient, despite passing metrics. Several QC seed failures identified within initial data reviews led to an investigation in which the impact of minute adjustments in Temsense instrument latency on classification efficacy was evaluated. Using Temsense data from multiple dynamic IVS datasets with RTK and SLAM positioning, we applied latency corrections in 0.01 second increments over a 1.2 second window. Results were inverted and classified to find the match metric, fit coherence and source offset. Plotting against the latency allowed selecting the optimal latency for the project. Results of the latency analysis were applied to one-pass datasets where QC seed failures were encountered, and classification results were assessed using optimized latency values. Improved match metric and fit coherence were observed within the data leading to passing classification results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202520287
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BEST OF SAGEEP: Impacts of Latency on Temsense One-pass Classification Results

Jeff Gamey, Brian Junck
Face Recognition and Perception
article

BEST OF SAGEEP: Impacts of Latency on Temsense One-pass Classification Results

Jeff Gamey, Brian Junck
article en

Abstract

Summary Latency corrections are key to producing accurate inversion results from AGC data. Visual inspection of response peaks in IVS data may not be sufficient, despite passing metrics. Several QC seed failures identified within initial data reviews led to an investigation in which the impact of minute adjustments in Temsense instrument latency on classification efficacy was evaluated. Using Temsense data from multiple dynamic IVS datasets with RTK and SLAM positioning, we applied latency corrections in 0.01 second increments over a 1.2 second window. Results were inverted and classified to find the match metric, fit coherence and source offset. Plotting against the latency allowed selecting the optimal latency for the project. Results of the latency analysis were applied to one-pass datasets where QC seed failures were encountered, and classification results were assessed using optimized latency values. Improved match metric and fit coherence were observed within the data leading to passing classification results.

Tetra Tech (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BEST OF SAGEEP: Impacts of Latency on Temsense One-pass Classification Results — Jeff Gamey, Brian Junck · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS