A comparative study of Ocean Literacy features in the science curricula of China and the United States: promoting oceanic power through formal education

Introduction Ocean Literacy (OL), as a core element in enhancing citizens’ Ocean Awareness, has gained wide attention in the field of education. However, existing studies indicate that the integration of OL into formal education remains insufficient. To address this gap, this study conducts a comparative analysis of the extent to which OL is incorporated into the science curriculum standards of China and the United States, and further examines the underlying ocean education philosophies in both countries. Methods This study employed content analysis and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Using content analysis, we examined the science curriculum standards of China and the United States with respect to: (1) the scope of coverage — the presence of the seven principles of the Ocean Literacy Framework (OLF) in the documents; (2) the quantity distribution — the occurrence frequency of each principle; and (3) the grading ranks — the forms in which the principles are represented. Using ENA, we treated the OL principles as network nodes and compared the structural differences between the two countries’ OL epistemic networks based on node size and inter-node relations, thereby illuminating each country’s underlying ocean education philosophy. Results and Discussion The results showed that the science curriculum of both countries covered the seven principles, yet exhibited notable similarities and differences across different educational stages and subject areas, thereby revealing the respective strengths and weaknesses in fostering OL. In addition, the ENA results highlighted distinctive emphases in the two countries’ ocean education philosophies: China stresses the “human–sea relationship,” while the United States focuses on an “interdisciplinary perspective to explain the principles of ocean system and ocean science.” Finally, the ENA results also pointed out specific shortcomings in the connections among OL principles within the science curriculum standards of both countries. Based on these findings, this study offers concrete recommendations for policy-makers, curriculum developers, and practitioners in ocean science research and education to further promote the integration of OL into formal curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1665829
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of Ocean Literacy features in the science curricula of China and the United States: promoting oceanic power through formal education

Yaqiong Lü, Chen Shi, Wang Kun, Jian Cheng et al.
Frontiers in Education
Coastal and Marine Management
article

A comparative study of Ocean Literacy features in the science curricula of China and the United States: promoting oceanic power through formal education

Yaqiong Lü, Chen Shi, Wang Kun, Jian Cheng, Mingcan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Ocean Literacy (OL), as a core element in enhancing citizens’ Ocean Awareness, has gained wide attention in the field of education. However, existing studies indicate that the integration of OL into formal education remains insufficient. To address this gap, this study conducts a comparative analysis of the extent to which OL is incorporated into the science curriculum standards of China and the United States, and further examines the underlying ocean education philosophies in both countries. Methods This study employed content analysis and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Using content analysis, we examined the science curriculum standards of China and the United States with respect to: (1) the scope of coverage — the presence of the seven principles of the Ocean Literacy Framework (OLF) in the documents; (2) the quantity distribution — the occurrence frequency of each principle; and (3) the grading ranks — the forms in which the principles are represented. Using ENA, we treated the OL principles as network nodes and compared the structural differences between the two countries’ OL epistemic networks based on node size and inter-node relations, thereby illuminating each country’s underlying ocean education philosophy. Results and Discussion The results showed that the science curriculum of both countries covered the seven principles, yet exhibited notable similarities and differences across different educational stages and subject areas, thereby revealing the respective strengths and weaknesses in fostering OL. In addition, the ENA results highlighted distinctive emphases in the two countries’ ocean education philosophies: China stresses the “human–sea relationship,” while the United States focuses on an “interdisciplinary perspective to explain the principles of ocean system and ocean science.” Finally, the ENA results also pointed out specific shortcomings in the connections among OL principles within the science curriculum standards of both countries. Based on these findings, this study offers concrete recommendations for policy-makers, curriculum developers, and practitioners in ocean science research and education to further promote the integration of OL into formal curricula.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Central China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.