To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations

Self-managing organizations (SMO) constitute a radical attempt to avoid hierarchical control and manager–subordinate authority relationships by suppressing them outright. For existing organizations, transiting to SMO poses significant challenges, especially for middle managers who became ‘architects of their own demise’. Combining 38 interviews, direct observation over 4 years, and secondary data we show in this paper that SMO transitions expose middle managers to a paradoxical situation that led them to engage in an escalation process of resistance that culminated in the subversion of the SMO experiment. These results contribute to SMO studies by documenting transition difficulties and the middle management paradox. Our study enriches knowledge on middle managers resistance in post-bureaucratic organizational forms by documenting the boundary conditions that allow the transition from individual to collective hidden and then collective, overt, and transformative forms of managerial resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
M n gement
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.9935
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations

Gazi Islam, Bertrand Valiorgue, Émilie Bourlier-Bargues
1 citations
M n gement
Family Business Performance and Succession
2.76
article

To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations

Gazi Islam, Bertrand Valiorgue, Émilie Bourlier-Bargues
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Self-managing organizations (SMO) constitute a radical attempt to avoid hierarchical control and manager–subordinate authority relationships by suppressing them outright. For existing organizations, transiting to SMO poses significant challenges, especially for middle managers who became ‘architects of their own demise’. Combining 38 interviews, direct observation over 4 years, and secondary data we show in this paper that SMO transitions expose middle managers to a paradoxical situation that led them to engage in an escalation process of resistance that culminated in the subversion of the SMO experiment. These results contribute to SMO studies by documenting transition difficulties and the middle management paradox. Our study enriches knowledge on middle managers resistance in post-bureaucratic organizational forms by documenting the boundary conditions that allow the transition from individual to collective hidden and then collective, overt, and transformative forms of managerial resistance.

M n gementVol. 28(3)
Clermont Recherche Management (FR), Sigma Clermont (FR), École de management de Lyon (FR), Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Family Business Performance and Succession
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations — Gazi Islam, Bertrand Valiorgue, et al. · M n gement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS