Critical reflections on framing nature-based solutions: considerations for long-term sustainability

The expanding landscape of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) faces increasing complexity, marked by evolving definitions and a surge in projects. While standardized frameworks are advocated, they risk excluding context-specific, innovative initiatives. This piece addresses the challenges of defining NbS, integrating diverse knowledge systems, and evaluating project success. We argue that rigid criteria can hinder inclusivity and overlook valuable local and Indigenous practices, central to sustainable ecosystem management. To address this, we propose a shift towards flexible evaluation frameworks that prioritize project outcomes, stakeholder inclusion, and long-term sustainability. Emphasizing adaptability and transparency, we advocate for integrating NbS into broader sustainability efforts, recognizing diverse approaches and supporting community-driven initiatives. This perspective aims to ensure NbS effectively contributes to environmental resilience and social equity, promoting a more inclusive and dynamic approach to achieving sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2025.2567453
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical reflections on framing nature-based solutions: considerations for long-term sustainability

Viola van Onselen, Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Critical reflections on framing nature-based solutions: considerations for long-term sustainability

Viola van Onselen, Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak
article en

Abstract

The expanding landscape of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) faces increasing complexity, marked by evolving definitions and a surge in projects. While standardized frameworks are advocated, they risk excluding context-specific, innovative initiatives. This piece addresses the challenges of defining NbS, integrating diverse knowledge systems, and evaluating project success. We argue that rigid criteria can hinder inclusivity and overlook valuable local and Indigenous practices, central to sustainable ecosystem management. To address this, we propose a shift towards flexible evaluation frameworks that prioritize project outcomes, stakeholder inclusion, and long-term sustainability. Emphasizing adaptability and transparency, we advocate for integrating NbS into broader sustainability efforts, recognizing diverse approaches and supporting community-driven initiatives. This perspective aims to ensure NbS effectively contributes to environmental resilience and social equity, promoting a more inclusive and dynamic approach to achieving sustainability goals.

Journal of Integrative Environmental SciencesVol. 22(1)
National Taiwan Normal University (TW), Nagasaki University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical reflections on framing nature-based solutions: considerations for long-term sustainability — Viola van Onselen, Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak · Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS