A Two-Layer Model for Complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Its Application in Institutional Research

Complex decision-making often involves numerous alternatives and diverse criteria, making it difficult to set clear priorities under resource constraints. This study proposes a two-layer hierarchical decision model that structures the process into sequential stages: the first layer narrows the alternatives according to strategic considerations, and the second layer re-evaluates the shortlisted options based on feasibility. This layered design clarifies the decision path and enhances interpretability compared to single-layer approaches. To demonstrate its practical value, the model is applied to an institutional research case in higher education, implemented with the entropy weight method (EWM) for weighting and TOPSIS for ranking. The results demonstrate that it supports transparent and resource-aware planning for performance improvement, while being scalable to multi-layer structure to accommodate diverse organizational needs and varying levels of complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied System Innovation
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8050148
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Two-Layer Model for Complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Its Application in Institutional Research

Yinghui Zhou, Atsushi Asano
Applied System Innovation
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Two-Layer Model for Complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Its Application in Institutional Research

Yinghui Zhou, Atsushi Asano
article en

Abstract

Complex decision-making often involves numerous alternatives and diverse criteria, making it difficult to set clear priorities under resource constraints. This study proposes a two-layer hierarchical decision model that structures the process into sequential stages: the first layer narrows the alternatives according to strategic considerations, and the second layer re-evaluates the shortlisted options based on feasibility. This layered design clarifies the decision path and enhances interpretability compared to single-layer approaches. To demonstrate its practical value, the model is applied to an institutional research case in higher education, implemented with the entropy weight method (EWM) for weighting and TOPSIS for ranking. The results demonstrate that it supports transparent and resource-aware planning for performance improvement, while being scalable to multi-layer structure to accommodate diverse organizational needs and varying levels of complexity.

Applied System InnovationVol. 8(5)
University of Aizu (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.