Do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in critical care: The gap between theory and practice

The provision or withholding of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is often a source of much controversy. Do-Not-Attempt CPR (DNACPR) decisions have been discussed extensively from an ethical and legal point, not to mention featuring heavily in the news. We aim to discuss various aspects of DNACPR decision-making with particular relevance to the Intensive Care environment. In doing so, we highlight important concepts associated with decision-making and common challenges encountered. Firstly, we provide a broad oversight of the current context in which such decisions are made before describing the principal ethical points of consideration and their relevance. This is followed by insights from a legal point as well as practical suggestions for approaching such decisions. It is hoped that these will help to assist clinicians with making such complex decisions under challenging circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251369306
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in critical care: The gap between theory and practice

Prashanth Nandhabalan, Thearina de Beer, Robert Tobin, Aaron D’Sa et al.
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in critical care: The gap between theory and practice

Prashanth Nandhabalan, Thearina de Beer, Robert Tobin, Aaron D’Sa, Victoria Metaxa, Daniel Harvey, Richard Innes
article en

Abstract

The provision or withholding of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is often a source of much controversy. Do-Not-Attempt CPR (DNACPR) decisions have been discussed extensively from an ethical and legal point, not to mention featuring heavily in the news. We aim to discuss various aspects of DNACPR decision-making with particular relevance to the Intensive Care environment. In doing so, we highlight important concepts associated with decision-making and common challenges encountered. Firstly, we provide a broad oversight of the current context in which such decisions are made before describing the principal ethical points of consideration and their relevance. This is followed by insights from a legal point as well as practical suggestions for approaching such decisions. It is hoped that these will help to assist clinicians with making such complex decisions under challenging circumstances.

Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Universidad Argentina John F. Kennedy (AR), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.