Knowledge and agential control: a non-reductive approach

Agential control has, with good reason, emerged as an important topic in the philosophy of action. This paper considers what reflection on control can tell us about some fundamental assumptions in the philosophy of action, and specifically about the role of the mind in action. I begin by arguing that some currently popular accounts of control (in terms either of the reliable execution of intentions, or of guidance by states of knowledge-how fail). It is not a new observation that the so-called “standard story” of action treats our actions as “composites” of mental and non-mental components. But it is far from clear that agential control can fit into such a model: control, after all, is both a matter of action execution, and an exercise of mentality, or practical intelligence. Accordingly, I propose an alternative approach that resists attempts to analyse control in such terms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05264-4
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge and agential control: a non-reductive approach

Markos Valaris
Synthese
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Knowledge and agential control: a non-reductive approach

Markos Valaris
article en

Abstract

Agential control has, with good reason, emerged as an important topic in the philosophy of action. This paper considers what reflection on control can tell us about some fundamental assumptions in the philosophy of action, and specifically about the role of the mind in action. I begin by arguing that some currently popular accounts of control (in terms either of the reliable execution of intentions, or of guidance by states of knowledge-how fail). It is not a new observation that the so-called “standard story” of action treats our actions as “composites” of mental and non-mental components. But it is far from clear that agential control can fit into such a model: control, after all, is both a matter of action execution, and an exercise of mentality, or practical intelligence. Accordingly, I propose an alternative approach that resists attempts to analyse control in such terms.

SyntheseVol. 206(4)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.