The people behind the pounds: a qualitative exploration of factors that help or hinder healthy, sustainable food purchases for people living with obesity and food insecurity in the UK

Good health is viewed as essential to enable citizens to live fulfilling lives, shape communities, and drive economic growth. However, health is socially patterned. Low socioeconomic status is associated with an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, where poor dietary patterns and diet-related obesity are likely contributors. Food purchasing can be influenced by many factors, including cost and income. Most food purchased to be consumed at home is acquired from supermarkets, and any increase in food prices disproportionately impacts low-income households, contributing to food insecurity. This study explored the factors that helped and hindered people living with obesity and food insecurity in purchasing healthy, environmentally sustainable food from supermarkets. Semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 25) and focus groups (<i>n</i> = 7) were conducted between June and December 2023 with adults living in Scotland and England who self-identified as living with obesity and food insecurity. Using thematic analysis, six main themes were identified: (1) <i>Supermarket deals</i>: perceptions surrounding <i>the good</i>, <i>the bad,</i> and <i>the ugly</i> side of supermarket offers and promotions; (2) <i>Skepticism about supermarkets and the wider food system</i>: questioning supermarket pricing motives but recognizing the role of the wider food system in food pricing; (3) <i>Other peoples' role in enhancing or undermining healthy diet intentions</i>: the impact of others in shaping food purchases; (4) <i>Financial restrictions facing non-UK nationals</i>: additional challenges faced by those with no recourse to public funds; (5) <i>The overwhelming in-store supermarket experience</i>: sensory overload and attempts to prevent unintended, impulse purchases; (6) <i>Unconscious, environmentally sustainable shopping practices</i>: cost saving practices that lead to environmentally sustainable purchasing patterns and behaviors as a unintentionally created outcome of budget maximizing strategies. However, such strategies, that is, limiting food waste and purchasing less meat, although beneficial for environmental sustainability, do not necessarily indicate that a healthier diet is being purchased or consumed. While views on some factors believed to help or hinder healthy, environmentally sustainable food purchases varied, there was general agreement amongst participants on the need for upstream changes, including having access to adequate benefits and wages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1646056
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The people behind the pounds: a qualitative exploration of factors that help or hinder healthy, sustainable food purchases for people living with obesity and food insecurity in the UK

Claire Griffiths, Charlotte A. Hardman, Rebecca Ann Stone, Flora Douglas et al.
Frontiers in Nutrition
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

The people behind the pounds: a qualitative exploration of factors that help or hinder healthy, sustainable food purchases for people living with obesity and food insecurity in the UK

Claire Griffiths, Charlotte A. Hardman, Rebecca Ann Stone, Flora Douglas, Alexandra M. Johnstone, Hannah Greatwood, Adrian Brown, Emma Hunter
article en

Abstract

Good health is viewed as essential to enable citizens to live fulfilling lives, shape communities, and drive economic growth. However, health is socially patterned. Low socioeconomic status is associated with an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, where poor dietary patterns and diet-related obesity are likely contributors. Food purchasing can be influenced by many factors, including cost and income. Most food purchased to be consumed at home is acquired from supermarkets, and any increase in food prices disproportionately impacts low-income households, contributing to food insecurity. This study explored the factors that helped and hindered people living with obesity and food insecurity in purchasing healthy, environmentally sustainable food from supermarkets. Semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 25) and focus groups (<i>n</i> = 7) were conducted between June and December 2023 with adults living in Scotland and England who self-identified as living with obesity and food insecurity. Using thematic analysis, six main themes were identified: (1) <i>Supermarket deals</i>: perceptions surrounding <i>the good</i>, <i>the bad,</i> and <i>the ugly</i> side of supermarket offers and promotions; (2) <i>Skepticism about supermarkets and the wider food system</i>: questioning supermarket pricing motives but recognizing the role of the wider food system in food pricing; (3) <i>Other peoples' role in enhancing or undermining healthy diet intentions</i>: the impact of others in shaping food purchases; (4) <i>Financial restrictions facing non-UK nationals</i>: additional challenges faced by those with no recourse to public funds; (5) <i>The overwhelming in-store supermarket experience</i>: sensory overload and attempts to prevent unintended, impulse purchases; (6) <i>Unconscious, environmentally sustainable shopping practices</i>: cost saving practices that lead to environmentally sustainable purchasing patterns and behaviors as a unintentionally created outcome of budget maximizing strategies. However, such strategies, that is, limiting food waste and purchasing less meat, although beneficial for environmental sustainability, do not necessarily indicate that a healthier diet is being purchased or consumed. While views on some factors believed to help or hinder healthy, environmentally sustainable food purchases varied, there was general agreement amongst participants on the need for upstream changes, including having access to adequate benefits and wages.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 12
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), University College London (GB), Robert Gordon University (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.