Is the end of insight in sight?

The rise of deep learning challenges the longstanding scientific ideal of insight—the human ability to understand phenomena by uncovering underlying mechanisms. From a physics perspective, we examine this tension through a case study: a physics-informed neural network (PINN) trained on rarefied gas dynamics governed by the Boltzmann equation. Despite strong physical constraints and a system with clear mechanistic structure, the trained network’s weight distributions remain close to Gaussian, showing no coarse-grained signature of the underlying physics. This result contrasts with theoretical expectations that such networks might retain structural features akin to discrete dynamical systems. We argue that high predictive accuracy does not imply interpretable internal representations and that explainability in physics-informed AI may not always be achievable—or necessary. These findings highlight a growing divergence between models that predict well and those that offer insight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1641727
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the end of insight in sight?

Mihir Durve, Jean‐Michel Tucny, Sauro Succi
Frontiers in Physics
Artificial Intelligence Applications
article

Is the end of insight in sight?

Mihir Durve, Jean‐Michel Tucny, Sauro Succi
article en

Abstract

The rise of deep learning challenges the longstanding scientific ideal of insight—the human ability to understand phenomena by uncovering underlying mechanisms. From a physics perspective, we examine this tension through a case study: a physics-informed neural network (PINN) trained on rarefied gas dynamics governed by the Boltzmann equation. Despite strong physical constraints and a system with clear mechanistic structure, the trained network’s weight distributions remain close to Gaussian, showing no coarse-grained signature of the underlying physics. This result contrasts with theoretical expectations that such networks might retain structural features akin to discrete dynamical systems. We argue that high predictive accuracy does not imply interpretable internal representations and that explainability in physics-informed AI may not always be achievable—or necessary. These findings highlight a growing divergence between models that predict well and those that offer insight.

Frontiers in PhysicsVol. 13
Roma Tre University (IT), Center for Nano Science and Technology (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Artificial Intelligence Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the end of insight in sight? — Mihir Durve, Jean‐Michel Tucny, et al. · Frontiers in Physics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS