The investigation of L2 writing process differences between argumentative and narrative genres

English writing is not only an essential role but also a notable challenge for L2 learners. While studies have explored strategies for enhancing L2 writing proficiency by focusing on analyzing written products (Dizon, 2016; Pyo, 2020), there is a growing interest in investigating the L1 and L2 writing process (Abas & Aziz, 2016; Cumming, 1998; Hartina et al., 2018; Silva, 1993). Additionally, the role of genre has been recognized as a crucial part of L2 writing, enabling researchers to examine the discourse and linguistic features related to textual compositions (Pyo, 2020; Rose, 2012; Watanabe, 2017). However, limited research has investigated from the perspective of the writing process in genres. Therefore, the study aimed to explore the differences in the writing process between argumentative and narrative genres composed by L2 writers. Two participants were recruited and performed one task for each genre. Each movement in their writing was annotated and categorized into one of the five writing stages: Planning, Drafting, Revising, Editing, and Inquiring. By comparing the writing stages in two genres, the results indicated a disparity in the time allocation to some extent. Moreover, it was also found that the students tended to prioritize tense editing and vocabulary inquiring in narrative writing rather than argumentative writing. In summary, this study has identified variations in the writing process between the two genres, contributing to the knowledge of the writing process in L2 writing. Moreover, the pedagogical implication could be helpful not only for L2 writing teachers to understand students’ writing difficulties further but also for L2 learners to enhance their writing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International CALL Research Conference
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29140/9780648184485-07
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The investigation of L2 writing process differences between argumentative and narrative genres

Hui-Hsien Feng, Yueh‐Ling Hsieh
Proceedings of the International CALL Research Conference
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

The investigation of L2 writing process differences between argumentative and narrative genres

Hui-Hsien Feng, Yueh‐Ling Hsieh
article en

Abstract

English writing is not only an essential role but also a notable challenge for L2 learners. While studies have explored strategies for enhancing L2 writing proficiency by focusing on analyzing written products (Dizon, 2016; Pyo, 2020), there is a growing interest in investigating the L1 and L2 writing process (Abas & Aziz, 2016; Cumming, 1998; Hartina et al., 2018; Silva, 1993). Additionally, the role of genre has been recognized as a crucial part of L2 writing, enabling researchers to examine the discourse and linguistic features related to textual compositions (Pyo, 2020; Rose, 2012; Watanabe, 2017). However, limited research has investigated from the perspective of the writing process in genres. Therefore, the study aimed to explore the differences in the writing process between argumentative and narrative genres composed by L2 writers. Two participants were recruited and performed one task for each genre. Each movement in their writing was annotated and categorized into one of the five writing stages: Planning, Drafting, Revising, Editing, and Inquiring. By comparing the writing stages in two genres, the results indicated a disparity in the time allocation to some extent. Moreover, it was also found that the students tended to prioritize tense editing and vocabulary inquiring in narrative writing rather than argumentative writing. In summary, this study has identified variations in the writing process between the two genres, contributing to the knowledge of the writing process in L2 writing. Moreover, the pedagogical implication could be helpful not only for L2 writing teachers to understand students’ writing difficulties further but also for L2 learners to enhance their writing strategies.

Proceedings of the International CALL Research ConferenceVol. 2024
University of Science and Technology (YE), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.