Identifying artificial intelligence use cases: toward a method that facilitates garbage can innovation processes

While artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer much potential for a wide range of AI uses in organizations, identifying use cases involves making many decisions amidst influencing complications. While nascent methods for identifying such AI use cases seem promising, we know very little about their proven efficacy to actually guide decisions during the use case identification process. To investigate this efficacy, we conducted action design research at EnBW, one of Europe’s largest energy suppliers. We draw on interviews and an intervention at EnBW’s practices to develop a method, derive six design principles, and describe factors that increase our method’s efficacy. We therefore contribute a novel theoretical perspective on decision-making in contexts of organized anarchy, explaining how organizations can navigate the complexities of decisions in AI use case identification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information & Management
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104261
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying artificial intelligence use cases: toward a method that facilitates garbage can innovation processes

Dominik Protschky, Peter Hofmann, Nils Urbach, Jan Jöhnk et al.
Information & Management
Data Quality and Management
article

Identifying artificial intelligence use cases: toward a method that facilitates garbage can innovation processes

Dominik Protschky, Peter Hofmann, Nils Urbach, Jan Jöhnk, Philipp Stähle, Christoph Buck
article en

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer much potential for a wide range of AI uses in organizations, identifying use cases involves making many decisions amidst influencing complications. While nascent methods for identifying such AI use cases seem promising, we know very little about their proven efficacy to actually guide decisions during the use case identification process. To investigate this efficacy, we conducted action design research at EnBW, one of Europe’s largest energy suppliers. We draw on interviews and an intervention at EnBW’s practices to develop a method, derive six design principles, and describe factors that increase our method’s efficacy. We therefore contribute a novel theoretical perspective on decision-making in contexts of organized anarchy, explaining how organizations can navigate the complexities of decisions in AI use case identification.

Information & ManagementVol. 63(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Energie Baden-Württemberg (Germany) (DE), Technische Hochschule Augsburg (DE), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Bayreuth (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identifying artificial intelligence use cases: toward a method that facilitates garbage can innovation processes — Dominik Protschky, Peter Hofmann, et al. · Information & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS