Adaptation and Performance of the Self‐Report‐Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort

Newly diagnosed patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) often have a history of other diseases, and these comorbidities can impact patient treatment and management options, as well as overall survival (OS). We developed the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) comorbidity index (LCI) as a sum of 10 comorbidities adapted from the Self-Report-Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index (SRG-CCI) for use in the LEO cohort, a national prospective study of newly diagnosed NHL. Of the 5502 participants with self-reported comorbidity data, 3107 (56.4%) were male and the mean age at diagnosis was 60.9 years (range, 18-99 years). The LCI ranged from 0 to 6, with 48.6% having 0, 30.2% having 1, 21.2% having 2 or more comorbidities. With a median follow-up of 62.4 months among surviving participants, 2099 patients had an event and 1219 died. Continuous LCI similarly predicted both 1-year mortality (c-statistic = 0.654) and OS (c-statistic = 0.655), while it showed a weaker but still statistically significant predictive ability for lymphoma-specific (c-statistics = 0.617) and event-free (c-statistic = 0.574) survival. Participants with 1 (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.39) and 2+ (HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.56-2.08) comorbidities had inferior OS compared to those with no comorbidities after adjustment for age and sex (c-statistic = 0.654), and performance strengthened after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index (c-statistic = 0.672). LCI predicted OS most strongly in marginal zone (c-statistics = 0.748) and weakest in T-cell (c-statistic = 0.579) lymphoma. The cumulative incidence of death due to lymphoma, lymphoma treatment, and other causes all increased with increasing comorbidities, with the greatest increase observed for death due to other causes. The LCI performs comparable to other published comorbidity indices, supporting its use in the LEO cohort to better model real-world outcomes and more generally providing an approach to implementing comorbidity indices in cancer survivorship cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematological Oncology
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70137
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptation and Performance of the Self‐Report‐Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort

Christopher Sun Strouse, Jonathon Brett Cohen, AnnaLynn M. Williams, Mazie Tsang et al.
Hematological Oncology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Adaptation and Performance of the Self‐Report‐Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort

Christopher Sun Strouse, Jonathon Brett Cohen, AnnaLynn M. Williams, Mazie Tsang, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, Elliot Cahn, Carrie A. Thompson, Thomas Matthew Habermann, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Jonathan W. Friedberg, Peter Martin, Izidore S. Lossos, Allison Rosenthal, Matthew J. Maurer, Carla Casulo, Brad S. Kahl, David L. Jaye, James R. Cerhan, Christopher R. Flowers, Brian K. Link, Andrew L. Feldman, Т. Н. Соколова
article en

Abstract

Newly diagnosed patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) often have a history of other diseases, and these comorbidities can impact patient treatment and management options, as well as overall survival (OS). We developed the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) comorbidity index (LCI) as a sum of 10 comorbidities adapted from the Self-Report-Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index (SRG-CCI) for use in the LEO cohort, a national prospective study of newly diagnosed NHL. Of the 5502 participants with self-reported comorbidity data, 3107 (56.4%) were male and the mean age at diagnosis was 60.9 years (range, 18-99 years). The LCI ranged from 0 to 6, with 48.6% having 0, 30.2% having 1, 21.2% having 2 or more comorbidities. With a median follow-up of 62.4 months among surviving participants, 2099 patients had an event and 1219 died. Continuous LCI similarly predicted both 1-year mortality (c-statistic = 0.654) and OS (c-statistic = 0.655), while it showed a weaker but still statistically significant predictive ability for lymphoma-specific (c-statistics = 0.617) and event-free (c-statistic = 0.574) survival. Participants with 1 (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.39) and 2+ (HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.56-2.08) comorbidities had inferior OS compared to those with no comorbidities after adjustment for age and sex (c-statistic = 0.654), and performance strengthened after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index (c-statistic = 0.672). LCI predicted OS most strongly in marginal zone (c-statistics = 0.748) and weakest in T-cell (c-statistic = 0.579) lymphoma. The cumulative incidence of death due to lymphoma, lymphoma treatment, and other causes all increased with increasing comorbidities, with the greatest increase observed for death due to other causes. The LCI performs comparable to other published comorbidity indices, supporting its use in the LEO cohort to better model real-world outcomes and more generally providing an approach to implementing comorbidity indices in cancer survivorship cohorts.

Hematological OncologyVol. 43(6)
University of Iowa (US), Mayo Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.