Comparison of clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation at different segments
UBED and PEID both achieve good clinical outcomes. PEID demonstrates significant advantages for L4/5 and L5/S1 LDH, offering less bleeding and shorter surgical time. UBED is advantageous for L3/4 LDH due to shorter surgical duration. PEID also allows omission of drainage tubes due to minimal postoperative drainage.
Authors
- Qi Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-7411)
- Zong‐Tao Chai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8100-4147)
- Yongxin Ren
- Jie Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-646X)
- Xiangjun Lu
- Dan Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6154-2191)
- You Lv
- Rende Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-3267)
Institutions
- Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
- Lianyungang Oriental Hospital (CN)
- The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (CN)
- Xuzhou Central Hospital (CN)
- Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
- Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Spine Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09414-7
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.41