Unravelling the Metacognitive Thinking Skills of Engineering Students: Exploring the Role of Age and Gender

This study aimed to investigate the metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students and explore the influence of age and gender on these skills. The Metacognitive Thinking Skills Scale developed by (Tuncer & Kaysi, 2013) was used to assess four dimensions: thinking skills, reflective skills towards problem-solving, decision-making, and alternative skills of evaluation. A sample of 270 engineering students from private colleges in Delhi NCR was taken for study. The research data was analyzed using IBM SPSS 26 and Smart PLS 4. The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.891. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, discriminant validity analysis, and structural equation modelling. The results showed that age had a significant positive impact on alternative skills of evaluation, decision-making skills, thinking skills, and reflective skills towards problem-solving among engineering students. However, gender had a minimal effect on these cognitive constructs with a slight impact on decision-making skills. The findings suggest that age plays a crucial role in the development of metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students, while gender differences are relatively insignificant in this context. Implications include educational interventions for fostering metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformation
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v39i2/25147
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling the Metacognitive Thinking Skills of Engineering Students: Exploring the Role of Age and Gender

Taranjeet Duggal, Charul Agrawal, Manoj Kumar, S.C. Shrivastava
Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformation
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Unravelling the Metacognitive Thinking Skills of Engineering Students: Exploring the Role of Age and Gender

Taranjeet Duggal, Charul Agrawal, Manoj Kumar, S.C. Shrivastava
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students and explore the influence of age and gender on these skills. The Metacognitive Thinking Skills Scale developed by (Tuncer & Kaysi, 2013) was used to assess four dimensions: thinking skills, reflective skills towards problem-solving, decision-making, and alternative skills of evaluation. A sample of 270 engineering students from private colleges in Delhi NCR was taken for study. The research data was analyzed using IBM SPSS 26 and Smart PLS 4. The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.891. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, discriminant validity analysis, and structural equation modelling. The results showed that age had a significant positive impact on alternative skills of evaluation, decision-making skills, thinking skills, and reflective skills towards problem-solving among engineering students. However, gender had a minimal effect on these cognitive constructs with a slight impact on decision-making skills. The findings suggest that age plays a crucial role in the development of metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students, while gender differences are relatively insignificant in this context. Implications include educational interventions for fostering metacognitive thinking skills among engineering students.

Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformationVol. 39(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.