‘The Right of Existence of Peoples as Independent Nations’

Abstract The article uncovers a significant historical connection between Raphael Lemkin, known for his work on genocide, and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in 1947. Archival discoveries reveal Lemkin’s involvement in discussions on defining the legal concept of aggressive war, aiming to influence the proceedings of the Tokyo Tribunal. A transcript of a US War Department conference shows how Lemkin’s legal philosophy, balancing natural law and practical pragmatism, guided his views on aggression. His preference for a common law approach to formulating legal norms also became evident. Linking the 1947 conference report to an earlier publication by Lemkin sheds light on his role in imagining a practicable legal concept of aggression during the pre- and post-World War II era. This historical connection and a survey of the epistemic communities around Lemkin foster a deeper understanding of his multifaceted contributions to international law and the prevention of mass atrocities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-bja10133
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The Right of Existence of Peoples as Independent Nations’

J. Klaus
Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international
International Law and Human Rights
article

‘The Right of Existence of Peoples as Independent Nations’

J. Klaus
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article uncovers a significant historical connection between Raphael Lemkin, known for his work on genocide, and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in 1947. Archival discoveries reveal Lemkin’s involvement in discussions on defining the legal concept of aggressive war, aiming to influence the proceedings of the Tokyo Tribunal. A transcript of a US War Department conference shows how Lemkin’s legal philosophy, balancing natural law and practical pragmatism, guided his views on aggression. His preference for a common law approach to formulating legal norms also became evident. Linking the 1947 conference report to an earlier publication by Lemkin sheds light on his role in imagining a practicable legal concept of aggression during the pre- and post-World War II era. This historical connection and a survey of the epistemic communities around Lemkin foster a deeper understanding of his multifaceted contributions to international law and the prevention of mass atrocities.

Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit internationalVol. 27(3)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.