Posterior Transforaminal Neural Decompression Fusion Procedure in Revision Spine Surgery.

Background context: Restenosis, pseudoarthrosis, implant complications, infection, adjacent segment problems, and flat back deformity are among the indications for revision spine surgery (RSS), which occurs in 8–45% of cases after primary spinal fusion procedures. Different surgical techniques for RSS are controversial, and selecting the right patient and technique is crucial to achieving a satisfactory outcome in RSS. Study design: Retrospective single-center clinical study. Purpose: The aim was to retrospectively evaluate the posterior transforaminal neural decompression fusion (PTNDF) results in patients needing RSS. Patients and methods: From 2018 to 2022, 50 patients who had undergone complex spinal fusion surgery and were experiencing uncontrollable back and leg pain were treated with PTNDF surgery. The PTNDF procedure involved either costotransverscetomy in the thoracic segments or facetectomy in the lumbar spine, neuroforaminal decompression, anterior reconstruction, and correction of profile imbalance with transpedicular fixation through only the posterior approach. Patients were examined and followed up clinically {pain (visual analog scale VAS), neurological deficit (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), functionally {Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Prolo scales}, and radiologically (deformity correction, lumbopelvic data, slippage reduction, and fusion time). Perioperative outcomes and complications were documented. Results: Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were significantly improved. 95% of patients had bony fusion. One patient had permanent neurological deficits. Four cases developed adjacent segment problems, either degeneration or instability, at the final stage. Conclusion: The PTNDF technique is an effective tool in RSS that combines neural decompression, correction of sagittal and coronal profiles, and functional improvement

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2025.426907.2099
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Posterior Transforaminal Neural Decompression Fusion Procedure in Revision Spine Surgery.

Khaled Omran, Ahmad Fouad Abdel-Baki Allam, Ahmed Ibrahim Abd Elsalam, Alhassan Ibrahim Hassan MORID
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Posterior Transforaminal Neural Decompression Fusion Procedure in Revision Spine Surgery.

Khaled Omran, Ahmad Fouad Abdel-Baki Allam, Ahmed Ibrahim Abd Elsalam, Alhassan Ibrahim Hassan MORID
article en

Abstract

Background context: Restenosis, pseudoarthrosis, implant complications, infection, adjacent segment problems, and flat back deformity are among the indications for revision spine surgery (RSS), which occurs in 8–45% of cases after primary spinal fusion procedures. Different surgical techniques for RSS are controversial, and selecting the right patient and technique is crucial to achieving a satisfactory outcome in RSS. Study design: Retrospective single-center clinical study. Purpose: The aim was to retrospectively evaluate the posterior transforaminal neural decompression fusion (PTNDF) results in patients needing RSS. Patients and methods: From 2018 to 2022, 50 patients who had undergone complex spinal fusion surgery and were experiencing uncontrollable back and leg pain were treated with PTNDF surgery. The PTNDF procedure involved either costotransverscetomy in the thoracic segments or facetectomy in the lumbar spine, neuroforaminal decompression, anterior reconstruction, and correction of profile imbalance with transpedicular fixation through only the posterior approach. Patients were examined and followed up clinically {pain (visual analog scale VAS), neurological deficit (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), functionally {Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Prolo scales}, and radiologically (deformity correction, lumbopelvic data, slippage reduction, and fusion time). Perioperative outcomes and complications were documented. Results: Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were significantly improved. 95% of patients had bony fusion. One patient had permanent neurological deficits. Four cases developed adjacent segment problems, either degeneration or instability, at the final stage. Conclusion: The PTNDF technique is an effective tool in RSS that combines neural decompression, correction of sagittal and coronal profiles, and functional improvement

Minia Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 0(0)
Minia University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.