Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis

This study evaluates the impact of Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) algorithms on human decision making in complex problem-solving tasks. Rather than assessing the algorithms in isolation, we focus on how their use shapes three critical cognitive components of decision making: analytical thinking, creative thinking, and systems thinking. In an experimental setting, student participants were randomly assigned to solve management consulting cases either with or without access to an AI algorithm. Their solutions were evaluated using a structured rubric that captures sub-skills across the three cognitive dimensions. The results of this exploratory study reveal that AI-supported participants achieved stronger outcomes in logical reasoning, structuring, and problem definition, but showed weaknesses in novel idea generation, multidisciplinary integration, and critical rejection of unsupported conclusions. These findings highlight how algorithmic support influences the configuration of human cognitive processes in decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18100631
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis

József Mezei, Nurlan Musazade, Xiaolu Wang
1 citations
Algorithms
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
1.54
article

Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis

József Mezei, Nurlan Musazade, Xiaolu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) algorithms on human decision making in complex problem-solving tasks. Rather than assessing the algorithms in isolation, we focus on how their use shapes three critical cognitive components of decision making: analytical thinking, creative thinking, and systems thinking. In an experimental setting, student participants were randomly assigned to solve management consulting cases either with or without access to an AI algorithm. Their solutions were evaluated using a structured rubric that captures sub-skills across the three cognitive dimensions. The results of this exploratory study reveal that AI-supported participants achieved stronger outcomes in logical reasoning, structuring, and problem definition, but showed weaknesses in novel idea generation, multidisciplinary integration, and critical rejection of unsupported conclusions. These findings highlight how algorithmic support influences the configuration of human cognitive processes in decision making.

AlgorithmsVol. 18(10)
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis — József Mezei, Nurlan Musazade, et al. · Algorithms (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS