How the organisation of mission arenas regulates attention away from regional problems and solutions: an attention-based view

Abstract Mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs) are promoting the formation of ‘mission arenas’ (MAs) where actors collectively try to address societal ‘wicked problems’. Yet, little is known about how attention — and subsequently time and effort — towards specific problems and solutions, and their geographical dimensions, unfolds within MAs. We conducted a multiple-case study of four MAs mandated and granted public funding to address self-articulated ‘missions’ in public health. We identify four distinct types of MA organisation with different attention-regulating properties that contribute to significant variation in MAs’ flexibility and breadth of attention. We propose a model explicating how all four MA organisations regulate attention in ways that impede future attention to regional problems and solutions — a finding that serves to problematise assumptions about attention in the MOIP literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaf031
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the organisation of mission arenas regulates attention away from regional problems and solutions: an attention-based view

Anna Essén, John-Erik Bergkvist, Karl Wennberg, Anna Krohwinkel
2 citations
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
International Development and Aid
6.90
article

How the organisation of mission arenas regulates attention away from regional problems and solutions: an attention-based view

Anna Essén, John-Erik Bergkvist, Karl Wennberg, Anna Krohwinkel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs) are promoting the formation of ‘mission arenas’ (MAs) where actors collectively try to address societal ‘wicked problems’. Yet, little is known about how attention — and subsequently time and effort — towards specific problems and solutions, and their geographical dimensions, unfolds within MAs. We conducted a multiple-case study of four MAs mandated and granted public funding to address self-articulated ‘missions’ in public health. We identify four distinct types of MA organisation with different attention-regulating properties that contribute to significant variation in MAs’ flexibility and breadth of attention. We propose a model explicating how all four MA organisations regulate attention in ways that impede future attention to regional problems and solutions — a finding that serves to problematise assumptions about attention in the MOIP literature.

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and SocietyVol. 18(3)
Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Development and Aid
6.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.