An Analysis of Grants Focused on Health Disparities Held by the National Cancer Institute’s Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, 2010–2024

Health communication can both reinforce and reduce adverse differences in cancer outcomes between groups. However, characteristics of cancer communication research aiming to reduce these health disparities have not been systematically assessed. Awarded research project grants in the National Cancer Institute's Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch (NCI-HCIRB) portfolio (2010-2024; <i>n</i> = 159) were coded to identify disparities focus and population(s) of interest. Disparities-focused grants were subsequently coded for cancer topic areas (e.g. cancer type) and research approach (i.e. methods, measures, analysis plan). Out of 159 grants, 64 (40%) had a health disparities focus. Of these, 78% developed or tested an intervention and 86% included a sample entirely comprised of populations known to experience health disparities. The most common populations of interest were racial or ethnic minority groups (55%), populations with lower socioeconomic status (20%), and rural residents (19%). Disparities-focused grants spanned varying cancer topics, including cancer prevention (53%) and breast cancer (27%). Nearly three-quarters of grants used both qualitative and quantitative research methods, and over one-third included community or participant engagement strategies. Drivers of health disparities were rarely measured beyond the individual level. Research may further prioritize engagement with affected communities and efforts to understand and address interpersonal and environmental factors influencing adverse differences in cancer outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2567513
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Grants Focused on Health Disparities Held by the National Cancer Institute’s Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, 2010–2024

Wen‐Ying Sylvia Chou, Robin C. Vanderpool, Heather D’Angelo, Amanda M. Acevedo et al.
Health Communication
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

An Analysis of Grants Focused on Health Disparities Held by the National Cancer Institute’s Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, 2010–2024

Wen‐Ying Sylvia Chou, Robin C. Vanderpool, Heather D’Angelo, Amanda M. Acevedo, Anna Gaysynsky, Nicole Senft
article en

Abstract

Health communication can both reinforce and reduce adverse differences in cancer outcomes between groups. However, characteristics of cancer communication research aiming to reduce these health disparities have not been systematically assessed. Awarded research project grants in the National Cancer Institute's Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch (NCI-HCIRB) portfolio (2010-2024; <i>n</i> = 159) were coded to identify disparities focus and population(s) of interest. Disparities-focused grants were subsequently coded for cancer topic areas (e.g. cancer type) and research approach (i.e. methods, measures, analysis plan). Out of 159 grants, 64 (40%) had a health disparities focus. Of these, 78% developed or tested an intervention and 86% included a sample entirely comprised of populations known to experience health disparities. The most common populations of interest were racial or ethnic minority groups (55%), populations with lower socioeconomic status (20%), and rural residents (19%). Disparities-focused grants spanned varying cancer topics, including cancer prevention (53%) and breast cancer (27%). Nearly three-quarters of grants used both qualitative and quantitative research methods, and over one-third included community or participant engagement strategies. Drivers of health disparities were rarely measured beyond the individual level. Research may further prioritize engagement with affected communities and efforts to understand and address interpersonal and environmental factors influencing adverse differences in cancer outcomes.

Health Communication
National Cancer Institute (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.