Liver dysfunction indices as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure patients

Abstract Aim Acute heart failure (AHF) causes significant short and long-term mortality. Thus, to improve the outcomes of AHF patients, risk stratification is mandatory. Our study evaluates the prognostic significance of five liver dysfunction indices: the Albumin/Bilirubin (ALBI) score, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Excluding INR (MELD-XI) score, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease including Albumin (MELD-Alb) score, the liver fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index, and the liver fibrosis 5 (FIB-5) index, as predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in AHF patients. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to compare these five risk scores for the same endpoint. Methods The five scores, as well as the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score, were calculated at admission for 107 AHF patients followed for all-cause in-hospital mortality. Each score was statistically analyzed as a continuous and categorical (three tertiles) variable using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. To detect the best cutoff value and compare the prognostic accuracy of the scores, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Results During the median hospitalization period (9 days), 36 (33.6%) patients died. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, the ALBI, MELD-Alb, FIB-4, and FIB-5 scores were statistically significant as a continuous variable for all-cause in-hospital mortality ( P < 0.05) with a cutoff value − 1.85, 25.5, 2.6, and − 7.92, respectively. Except for the FIB-4 index, they were also significant as a categorical variable ( P < 0.05). The MELD-XI score was not significant for mortality in the adjusted model. In the ROC analysis, the ALBI score demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.935), followed by the MELD-Alb score (AUC = 0.825) and the FIB-5 index (AUC = 0.759). A model combining ALBI score and GWTG-HF risk score showed a better prognostic accuracy (AUC = 0.946). Conclusion The ALBI score, MELD-Alb score, and FIB-5 index could be useful predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in AHF patients, with the ALBI score exhibiting the highest predictive accuracy, and a model that combines the GWTG-HF risk score and ALBI score is of better prognostic value. Further research is needed for validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-025-00533-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liver dysfunction indices as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure patients

Shaimaa Mohamed Ali, Ahmed S. Saad, Rehna Chaneparambil Mohamed, Moataz Fathy Mohamed et al.
1 citations
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.32
article

Liver dysfunction indices as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure patients

Shaimaa Mohamed Ali, Ahmed S. Saad, Rehna Chaneparambil Mohamed, Moataz Fathy Mohamed, Ahmed Mohamed Shennawy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim Acute heart failure (AHF) causes significant short and long-term mortality. Thus, to improve the outcomes of AHF patients, risk stratification is mandatory. Our study evaluates the prognostic significance of five liver dysfunction indices: the Albumin/Bilirubin (ALBI) score, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Excluding INR (MELD-XI) score, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease including Albumin (MELD-Alb) score, the liver fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index, and the liver fibrosis 5 (FIB-5) index, as predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in AHF patients. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to compare these five risk scores for the same endpoint. Methods The five scores, as well as the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score, were calculated at admission for 107 AHF patients followed for all-cause in-hospital mortality. Each score was statistically analyzed as a continuous and categorical (three tertiles) variable using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. To detect the best cutoff value and compare the prognostic accuracy of the scores, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Results During the median hospitalization period (9 days), 36 (33.6%) patients died. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, the ALBI, MELD-Alb, FIB-4, and FIB-5 scores were statistically significant as a continuous variable for all-cause in-hospital mortality ( P < 0.05) with a cutoff value − 1.85, 25.5, 2.6, and − 7.92, respectively. Except for the FIB-4 index, they were also significant as a categorical variable ( P < 0.05). The MELD-XI score was not significant for mortality in the adjusted model. In the ROC analysis, the ALBI score demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.935), followed by the MELD-Alb score (AUC = 0.825) and the FIB-5 index (AUC = 0.759). A model combining ALBI score and GWTG-HF risk score showed a better prognostic accuracy (AUC = 0.946). Conclusion The ALBI score, MELD-Alb score, and FIB-5 index could be useful predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in AHF patients, with the ALBI score exhibiting the highest predictive accuracy, and a model that combines the GWTG-HF risk score and ALBI score is of better prognostic value. Further research is needed for validation.

The Egyptian Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 37(1)
Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.