DIALEKTIKA EPISTEMOLOGI ISLAM KLASIK DAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM MODERN: ANALISIS FILOSOFIS ATAS RELEVANSI PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBN RUSHD

Through a philosophical examination of the thinking of AlGhazali and Ibn Rushd, this research examines the dialectics of classical Islamic epistemology and contemporary Islamic Religious Education (IRE). The study’s driving force is the epistemological issues of current IRE, which is frequently seen as normative and lacking in critical engagement, necessitating a more comprehensive philosophical framework. The goals are to analyze the dialectical connection between the two authors, describe their epistemology, and discuss its significance for contemporary IRE. Utilizing primary materials from AlGhazali and Ibn Rushd as well as pertinent secondary literature, this work adopts a philosophical-hermeneutic approach to library research. According to the findings, Ibn Rushd prioritizes rationality and the compatibility of philosophy and sharī’a, whereas AlGhazali’s epistemology combines reason and intuition (kashf) with a focus on spirituality. Their dialectics yield an inclusive epistemological framework that reconciles rational-critical and moral-spiritual components. The implication is that modern IRE can be cultivated as a middle-of-the-road, conversational, and globally relevant educational model. Theoretically, this study adds to the discussion of Islamic philosophy of education, and practically, it helps to create modern IRE curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imtiyaz Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i3.2555
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIALEKTIKA EPISTEMOLOGI ISLAM KLASIK DAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM MODERN: ANALISIS FILOSOFIS ATAS RELEVANSI PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBN RUSHD

Suyono Yono
Imtiyaz Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman
Education and Character Development
article

DIALEKTIKA EPISTEMOLOGI ISLAM KLASIK DAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM MODERN: ANALISIS FILOSOFIS ATAS RELEVANSI PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBN RUSHD

Suyono Yono
article en

Abstract

Through a philosophical examination of the thinking of AlGhazali and Ibn Rushd, this research examines the dialectics of classical Islamic epistemology and contemporary Islamic Religious Education (IRE). The study’s driving force is the epistemological issues of current IRE, which is frequently seen as normative and lacking in critical engagement, necessitating a more comprehensive philosophical framework. The goals are to analyze the dialectical connection between the two authors, describe their epistemology, and discuss its significance for contemporary IRE. Utilizing primary materials from AlGhazali and Ibn Rushd as well as pertinent secondary literature, this work adopts a philosophical-hermeneutic approach to library research. According to the findings, Ibn Rushd prioritizes rationality and the compatibility of philosophy and sharī’a, whereas AlGhazali’s epistemology combines reason and intuition (kashf) with a focus on spirituality. Their dialectics yield an inclusive epistemological framework that reconciles rational-critical and moral-spiritual components. The implication is that modern IRE can be cultivated as a middle-of-the-road, conversational, and globally relevant educational model. Theoretically, this study adds to the discussion of Islamic philosophy of education, and practically, it helps to create modern IRE curricula.

Imtiyaz Jurnal Ilmu KeislamanVol. 9(3)
Yulin University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education and Character Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.