Comparative efficacy of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in treating de novo CAD in ACS
Drug-eluting stents (DES) are a common treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but pose risks like bleeding, re-stenosis, stent thrombosis, and neo-atherosclerosis. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) may mitigate these risks. This study compares DCB therapy’s effectiveness with DES in ACS patients with de novo lesions. A retrospective observational study was conducted on ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either DES or DCB from May 2019 to August 2022 at a single tertiary centre. Patients with left central trunk lesions were excluded. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation, evaluated 12 months post-intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using R software with significance set at a two-tailed p value <0.05. Of 168 patients, 101 received DES and 67 received DCB. The DCB group had a mean age of 61.9 years, while the DES group averaged 63 years. The DCB group had more prior PCIs and myocardial infarctions. Baseline characteristics, including target and number of lesions, were comparable. MACE occurred in eight (11.9%) DCB patients and 11 (10.9%) DES patients, showing no significant difference (p=0.64). In conclusion, this study suggests that DCB therapy may be an effective alternative to DES for ACS. However, limitations, including a single-centre setting and short follow-up, warrant the need for more extensive, randomised trials to validate these findings.
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Cardiology
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2025.044
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00