Artificial Intelligence and Fragile Democracy in West Africa: Between Digital Repression and Citizen Mobilization

This article explores the ambivalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the fragile democracies of West Africa, based on a qualitative study involving 385 participants in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. It highlights a dual use of AI: as a tool of digital repression (surveillance, censorship, disinformation) and as a lever for citizen mobilization (fact-checking, mapping, diaspora activism). This tension confirms that AI can both reinforce authoritarianism and support democratic action. The article introduces two concepts: contradicted algorithmic sovereignty, referring to African states’ structural dependence on foreign technologies; and algorithmic vulnerability, characterizing their increased exposure to digital manipulation. The study calls for an African regulatory framework on AI and for comparative, longitudinal research into its political uses in fragile contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct151
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Fragile Democracy in West Africa: Between Digital Repression and Citizen Mobilization

Etienne Fakaba Sissoko, Khalid Dembele
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
article

Artificial Intelligence and Fragile Democracy in West Africa: Between Digital Repression and Citizen Mobilization

Etienne Fakaba Sissoko, Khalid Dembele
article en

Abstract

This article explores the ambivalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the fragile democracies of West Africa, based on a qualitative study involving 385 participants in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. It highlights a dual use of AI: as a tool of digital repression (surveillance, censorship, disinformation) and as a lever for citizen mobilization (fact-checking, mapping, diaspora activism). This tension confirms that AI can both reinforce authoritarianism and support democratic action. The article introduces two concepts: contradicted algorithmic sovereignty, referring to African states’ structural dependence on foreign technologies; and algorithmic vulnerability, characterizing their increased exposure to digital manipulation. The study calls for an African regulatory framework on AI and for comparative, longitudinal research into its political uses in fragile contexts.

Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.