Visual Assessment of Methane Hydrate Dissociation Using a Multi-Rocking Cell: Roles of Surfactants, KHIs, and AAs in Water-Rich Systems

This study uses a new multi-rocking cell system for visual, parallel assessment of methane hydrate (MH) dissociation. The method allows for systematic comparison of various fluidizerscomposed of thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors like urea and additives including surfactants, kinetic hydrate inhibitors, and antiagglomerantsunder controlled, water-rich conditions. Our findings show that surfactants, such as SDS, SO, and DDBSA, accelerate dissociation but cause MH migration and persistent foaming. In contrast, DTMAC and saponin effectively promote dissociation while suppressing foam and MH migration. Combination fluidizers (e.g., SDS + PVP, SDS + Tween 80) further fine-tuned the performance, demonstrating additive-specific effects such as foam suppression or accelerated dissociation. This work provides insights for designing effective fluidizers for hydrate management in subsea production environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chem & Bio Engineering
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cbe.5c00067
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Assessment of Methane Hydrate Dissociation Using a Multi-Rocking Cell: Roles of Surfactants, KHIs, and AAs in Water-Rich Systems

Sanehiro Muromachi, Satoshi Takeya, Yoshihiro Konno, Michihiro Muraoka et al.
Chem & Bio Engineering
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Visual Assessment of Methane Hydrate Dissociation Using a Multi-Rocking Cell: Roles of Surfactants, KHIs, and AAs in Water-Rich Systems

Sanehiro Muromachi, Satoshi Takeya, Yoshihiro Konno, Michihiro Muraoka, Kiyofumi Suzuki, Norio Tenma
article en

Abstract

This study uses a new multi-rocking cell system for visual, parallel assessment of methane hydrate (MH) dissociation. The method allows for systematic comparison of various fluidizerscomposed of thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors like urea and additives including surfactants, kinetic hydrate inhibitors, and antiagglomerantsunder controlled, water-rich conditions. Our findings show that surfactants, such as SDS, SO, and DDBSA, accelerate dissociation but cause MH migration and persistent foaming. In contrast, DTMAC and saponin effectively promote dissociation while suppressing foam and MH migration. Combination fluidizers (e.g., SDS + PVP, SDS + Tween 80) further fine-tuned the performance, demonstrating additive-specific effects such as foam suppression or accelerated dissociation. This work provides insights for designing effective fluidizers for hydrate management in subsea production environments.

Chem & Bio EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Yokohama National University (JP), Frontier Environmental Technology (United States) (US), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.