Ethical Issues in Business Innovation: Patents, Competition and Consumer Right

Innovation drives economic progress, but patent arrangements designed to encourage innovation increasingly conflict with market equality and consumer accessibility. This research investigates the ethical difficulties associated with intellectual property protection in various industries, notably with essential goods. Patent holders exert significant influence over markets, price, and accessibility, prompting questions regarding their ethical obligations beyond mere legal compliance. Pharmaceutical patents demonstrate these tensions very well. Government funding for research and lifesaving pharmaceuticals produced through public-private partnerships sometimes remains unattainable for individuals in the most critical situations. Technology patents reveal unique yet equally troubling patterns, as the protection of innovation evolves into commercial exploitation via strategic litigation and portfolio consolidation. These activities indicate that patent regimes may be compromising their fundamental goal of promoting innovation that benefits society. Current regulatory regimes inadequately address these ethical considerations. Patent law primarily focuses on technical originality and financial entitlements, sometimes neglecting wider societal consequences. This restricted focus allows for behaviors that may comply with legal criteria but violate ethical principles of fairness, accessibility, and public welfare. Market failures in patent protected sectors exemplify the costs linked to this approach. Reform requires the recognition that patent rights impose societal responsibilities. Potential solutions include public interest licensing for government-funded research, price restriction for essential patents, and strengthened antitrust enforcement against patent misuse. Innovation policy should go beyond safeguarding inventors to guarantee that innovation serves humanity's interests. This transformation necessitates new frameworks that align corporate incentives with public welfare, making patent systems responsible to the societies that provide them legitimacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pathfinder of Research
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69937/pf.por.3.3.55
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Issues in Business Innovation: Patents, Competition and Consumer Right

Khadiza Begum, Sadiqur Rahman Chowdhury Urbi
1 citations
Pathfinder of Research
Intellectual Property and Patents
2.76
article

Ethical Issues in Business Innovation: Patents, Competition and Consumer Right

Khadiza Begum, Sadiqur Rahman Chowdhury Urbi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Innovation drives economic progress, but patent arrangements designed to encourage innovation increasingly conflict with market equality and consumer accessibility. This research investigates the ethical difficulties associated with intellectual property protection in various industries, notably with essential goods. Patent holders exert significant influence over markets, price, and accessibility, prompting questions regarding their ethical obligations beyond mere legal compliance. Pharmaceutical patents demonstrate these tensions very well. Government funding for research and lifesaving pharmaceuticals produced through public-private partnerships sometimes remains unattainable for individuals in the most critical situations. Technology patents reveal unique yet equally troubling patterns, as the protection of innovation evolves into commercial exploitation via strategic litigation and portfolio consolidation. These activities indicate that patent regimes may be compromising their fundamental goal of promoting innovation that benefits society. Current regulatory regimes inadequately address these ethical considerations. Patent law primarily focuses on technical originality and financial entitlements, sometimes neglecting wider societal consequences. This restricted focus allows for behaviors that may comply with legal criteria but violate ethical principles of fairness, accessibility, and public welfare. Market failures in patent protected sectors exemplify the costs linked to this approach. Reform requires the recognition that patent rights impose societal responsibilities. Potential solutions include public interest licensing for government-funded research, price restriction for essential patents, and strengthened antitrust enforcement against patent misuse. Innovation policy should go beyond safeguarding inventors to guarantee that innovation serves humanity's interests. This transformation necessitates new frameworks that align corporate incentives with public welfare, making patent systems responsible to the societies that provide them legitimacy.

Pathfinder of ResearchVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intellectual Property and Patents
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.