Pharmacist-led deprescribing in older adults with cancer in ambulatory clinics: A sustainable QI initiative.

42 Background: Polypharmacy in older adults is associated with increased risk of adverse drug events, toxicity, hospitalizations, and mortality. Patients receiving cancer treatment may be particularly vulnerable to the risks of polypharmacy. Deprescribing - the process of reducing, discontinuing, or adjusting medications that are unnecessary or potentially harmful – can improve patient quality of life, decrease treatment toxicity, and reduce healthcare costs. Identification and optimization of polypharmacy in older adults is a priority outlined in the ASCO geriatric oncology guidelines. Methods: We aimed to reduce polypharmacy in at least 50% of eligible patients by March 2025 using quality improvement methodology. Eligible patients were those aged 65 years and older, prescribed 5 or more medications, and who were receiving outpatient anti-cancer treatments. Deprescribing was integrated into the existing pharmacy medication reconciliation workflow. Interventions were communicated directly to the patient and/or prescriber with clinical rationale provided. Deprescribing success - our primary outcome - was evaluated 3 months post intervention by patient confirmation and/or review of provincial pharmacy records. Adverse events were evaluated 6 months post intervention by chart review. Results: We present results from the first two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Between April 1st, 2024, and January 31st, 2025, 40 patients (mean age 78.0 +/- 6.9 years) were identified, taking an average of 7.6 +/- 2.6 medications per patient, of which 1.6 +/- 1.0 were deemed potentially inappropriate. Statins (22%), antihypertensives (11%) and proton pump inhibitors (11%) were the most commonly deprescribed medication classes of the 63 interventions. Medications were mostly discontinued (84%) rather than changed (16%), with ineffective/unnecessary drug therapy (41%) being the most common rationale. At the 3-month follow-up, 65% of patients had at least one successful intervention, with 57% of inappropriate medications successfully deprescribed. Minor adverse events potentially related to deprescribing occurred in 14% of accepted interventions. The leading reason for unsuccessful interventions was prescriber disagreement (67%). Conclusions: Pharmacist-led deprescribing successfully reduced polypharmacy in 65% of selected older patients receiving cancer care in British Columbia. This initiative resulted in 57% of inappropriate medications being deprescribed, with a 14% rate of minor adverse events potentially related to the intervention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.42
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacist-led deprescribing in older adults with cancer in ambulatory clinics: A sustainable QI initiative.

Lauren Curry, Caroline Mariano, Jennifer Truong, Dennis Jang et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Pharmacist-led deprescribing in older adults with cancer in ambulatory clinics: A sustainable QI initiative.

Lauren Curry, Caroline Mariano, Jennifer Truong, Dennis Jang, David Gallagher, Matthew Mah, Michael S. Koehle, Maxwell Gillatt
article en

Abstract

42 Background: Polypharmacy in older adults is associated with increased risk of adverse drug events, toxicity, hospitalizations, and mortality. Patients receiving cancer treatment may be particularly vulnerable to the risks of polypharmacy. Deprescribing - the process of reducing, discontinuing, or adjusting medications that are unnecessary or potentially harmful – can improve patient quality of life, decrease treatment toxicity, and reduce healthcare costs. Identification and optimization of polypharmacy in older adults is a priority outlined in the ASCO geriatric oncology guidelines. Methods: We aimed to reduce polypharmacy in at least 50% of eligible patients by March 2025 using quality improvement methodology. Eligible patients were those aged 65 years and older, prescribed 5 or more medications, and who were receiving outpatient anti-cancer treatments. Deprescribing was integrated into the existing pharmacy medication reconciliation workflow. Interventions were communicated directly to the patient and/or prescriber with clinical rationale provided. Deprescribing success - our primary outcome - was evaluated 3 months post intervention by patient confirmation and/or review of provincial pharmacy records. Adverse events were evaluated 6 months post intervention by chart review. Results: We present results from the first two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Between April 1st, 2024, and January 31st, 2025, 40 patients (mean age 78.0 +/- 6.9 years) were identified, taking an average of 7.6 +/- 2.6 medications per patient, of which 1.6 +/- 1.0 were deemed potentially inappropriate. Statins (22%), antihypertensives (11%) and proton pump inhibitors (11%) were the most commonly deprescribed medication classes of the 63 interventions. Medications were mostly discontinued (84%) rather than changed (16%), with ineffective/unnecessary drug therapy (41%) being the most common rationale. At the 3-month follow-up, 65% of patients had at least one successful intervention, with 57% of inappropriate medications successfully deprescribed. Minor adverse events potentially related to deprescribing occurred in 14% of accepted interventions. The leading reason for unsuccessful interventions was prescriber disagreement (67%). Conclusions: Pharmacist-led deprescribing successfully reduced polypharmacy in 65% of selected older patients receiving cancer care in British Columbia. This initiative resulted in 57% of inappropriate medications being deprescribed, with a 14% rate of minor adverse events potentially related to the intervention.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.