Compassionate care, measurable impact: Evaluation of embedded physician-led palliative care in a community oncology practice.

303 Background: Despite growing recognition of the value of integrated palliative care in oncology, there is no clear consensus on how to integrate palliative care within oncology, particularly in community-based environments. Embedding palliative care physician consultants within a community oncology practice offers a promising approach by fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and aligning care delivery. We examined quality outcomes of the embedded palliative care program within a community oncology practice. Methods: The population included patients who died in 2023 and 2024 and at least 2 E&M visits in the practice within 12 months preceding death. The provision of palliative care was determined by a visit with the palliative care provider within the same time frame. Hospice enrollment and receiving chemotherapy during the last 14 days of life were also extracted from the EHR. Results: There was a total of 824 patients. Key End-of-Life (EOL) metrics were compared for patients who had visit(s) with a palliative care provider and those who did not. Bivariate statistics are provided in Table 1. Patients with palliative care were 1.9 times more likely to enroll in hospice and 48% less likely to have a length of stay (LOS) less than 3 days. No association was found between receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days and palliative care. Multivariate analysis adjusting for patient age, gender, time from diagnosis to death, metastatic status, and language spoken was consistent with bivariate analysis. Conclusions: This analysis indicates that embedding palliative care physicians within a community oncology practice significantly increases hospice enrollment and LOS greater than 3 days. These findings support a cooperative care model as a practical strategy for integrating palliative care physicians into community-based oncology practices to improve patients’ EOL outcomes. Palliative Care Odds Ratio P-value Outcomes Yes (N=448) No (N =376) Hospice Yes 256 157 1.9 No 192 219 <.0001 Hospice <3 days Yes 29 31 0.52 No 227 126 0.02 Chemo received in the last 14 days Yes 39 44 0.72 No 409 332 0.2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.303
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compassionate care, measurable impact: Evaluation of embedded physician-led palliative care in a community oncology practice.

Haibei Liu, Jessica Heintz, Geoffrey Daniel Moorer, Karen Miller et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Compassionate care, measurable impact: Evaluation of embedded physician-led palliative care in a community oncology practice.

Haibei Liu, Jessica Heintz, Geoffrey Daniel Moorer, Karen Miller, Jillian Hellmann
article en

Abstract

303 Background: Despite growing recognition of the value of integrated palliative care in oncology, there is no clear consensus on how to integrate palliative care within oncology, particularly in community-based environments. Embedding palliative care physician consultants within a community oncology practice offers a promising approach by fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and aligning care delivery. We examined quality outcomes of the embedded palliative care program within a community oncology practice. Methods: The population included patients who died in 2023 and 2024 and at least 2 E&M visits in the practice within 12 months preceding death. The provision of palliative care was determined by a visit with the palliative care provider within the same time frame. Hospice enrollment and receiving chemotherapy during the last 14 days of life were also extracted from the EHR. Results: There was a total of 824 patients. Key End-of-Life (EOL) metrics were compared for patients who had visit(s) with a palliative care provider and those who did not. Bivariate statistics are provided in Table 1. Patients with palliative care were 1.9 times more likely to enroll in hospice and 48% less likely to have a length of stay (LOS) less than 3 days. No association was found between receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days and palliative care. Multivariate analysis adjusting for patient age, gender, time from diagnosis to death, metastatic status, and language spoken was consistent with bivariate analysis. Conclusions: This analysis indicates that embedding palliative care physicians within a community oncology practice significantly increases hospice enrollment and LOS greater than 3 days. These findings support a cooperative care model as a practical strategy for integrating palliative care physicians into community-based oncology practices to improve patients’ EOL outcomes. Palliative Care Odds Ratio P-value Outcomes Yes (N=448) No (N =376) Hospice Yes 256 157 1.9 No 192 219 <.0001 Hospice <3 days Yes 29 31 0.52 No 227 126 0.02 Chemo received in the last 14 days Yes 39 44 0.72 No 409 332 0.2

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
McKesson (United States) (US), Virginia Cancer Specialists (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.