Enhanced recovery program (ERP) for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgeries in rural and urban hospitals of Alabama and Mississippi.

43 Background: ERPs standardize surgical care leading to improvements in perioperative outcomes and have reduced surgical outcome disparities in some settings. The extent to which ERPs are applied across urban and rural settings is not known. We begin to address this gap for patients undergoing surgery for GI cancer (colorectal, pancreatic, and esophageal) in Alabama and Mississippi. Methods: The ASCENDS study conducted surveys of GI cancer patients (stage 1-3, diagnosed within 5 years), and abstracted hospital charts for a subset of respondents. Survey questions assessed self-reported adherence to 10 ERP components, and chart abstractions assessed hospital-based adherence to 11 components. Overall ERP adherence was defined as adherence to ≥70% of ERP components. Results: Of 559 survey respondents (mean age 63.2±12.0), 54.2% were women, 80.5% had colorectal,14.3% pancreatic, and 5.2% esophageal cancer, 92.3% from urban and 7.7% from rural hospitals. The 259 respondents with charts abstracted had similar characteristics (6.6% from rural hospitals). Overall ERP adherence was 6.4% for self-reported surveys, and 42.9% for hospital-based chart abstractions. The Table reports highest to lowest adherence to each component by surgery phase. Moreover, education/counseling about surgery was documented in 96.7% of charts, antiemetic prophylaxis pre or intraoperative in 97.9%, and normothermia in 59.6%. Nausea/vomiting medications after surgery was reported in 78.9% surveys. Conclusions: Overall ERP adherence in GI cancer patients from the Deep South was low but not uniformly across ERP components. Self-reported adherence may be subject to recall limitations. Future efforts should focus on barriers providers and patients face to achieving adherence to all ERP components. Phase ERP Component Reported in Survey % Reported ERP Component Documented in Medical Chart % Documented Preoperative Bowel prep with laxative products (e.g., miralax) (N=393) 82.1 Bowel prep: mechanical (N=136) 65.4 Bowel prep with antibiotics (e.g., flagyl) (N=370) 46.8 Preoperative oral antibiotics (N=153) 50.3 Carbohydrate loading: Sugary carbohydrate rich drink before surgery (N=455) 18.3 Clear liquids up to 2 hours before surgery (N=124) 98.4 Pain medication: Injection in back or side (N=422) 38.6 Pain medication: Preoperative block (spinal, TAP, etc.) (N=167) 52.1 DVT prophylaxis before surgery (N=385) 27.8 Preop VTE Chemoprophylaxis (N=142) 95.8 Postoperative No nasogastric tube (N=512) 83.4 No nasogastric tube (N=160) 76.3 Foley catheter removed within 3 days (N=363) 73.0 Foley catheter removed within 3 days (N=143) 83.9 Pain medication: Any (N=539)Pain medication: No opioids (N=408) 94.819.3 Pain control: Multimodal (preoperative block plus postoperative medications e.g., toradol) (N=159) 70.4 Denominators vary due to missing response or ineligibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.43
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced recovery program (ERP) for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgeries in rural and urban hospitals of Alabama and Mississippi.

Daniel I. Chu, Nataliya V. Ivankova, Wendelyn M. Oslock, Lauren Wood et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Enhanced recovery program (ERP) for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgeries in rural and urban hospitals of Alabama and Mississippi.

Daniel I. Chu, Nataliya V. Ivankova, Wendelyn M. Oslock, Lauren Wood, Bayley A. Jones, Anastasia Arynchyna-Smith, Alizeh Abbas, Yu‐Mei Schoenberger, Nathan English, Gianina M. Hernandez-Marquez
article en

Abstract

43 Background: ERPs standardize surgical care leading to improvements in perioperative outcomes and have reduced surgical outcome disparities in some settings. The extent to which ERPs are applied across urban and rural settings is not known. We begin to address this gap for patients undergoing surgery for GI cancer (colorectal, pancreatic, and esophageal) in Alabama and Mississippi. Methods: The ASCENDS study conducted surveys of GI cancer patients (stage 1-3, diagnosed within 5 years), and abstracted hospital charts for a subset of respondents. Survey questions assessed self-reported adherence to 10 ERP components, and chart abstractions assessed hospital-based adherence to 11 components. Overall ERP adherence was defined as adherence to ≥70% of ERP components. Results: Of 559 survey respondents (mean age 63.2±12.0), 54.2% were women, 80.5% had colorectal,14.3% pancreatic, and 5.2% esophageal cancer, 92.3% from urban and 7.7% from rural hospitals. The 259 respondents with charts abstracted had similar characteristics (6.6% from rural hospitals). Overall ERP adherence was 6.4% for self-reported surveys, and 42.9% for hospital-based chart abstractions. The Table reports highest to lowest adherence to each component by surgery phase. Moreover, education/counseling about surgery was documented in 96.7% of charts, antiemetic prophylaxis pre or intraoperative in 97.9%, and normothermia in 59.6%. Nausea/vomiting medications after surgery was reported in 78.9% surveys. Conclusions: Overall ERP adherence in GI cancer patients from the Deep South was low but not uniformly across ERP components. Self-reported adherence may be subject to recall limitations. Future efforts should focus on barriers providers and patients face to achieving adherence to all ERP components. Phase ERP Component Reported in Survey % Reported ERP Component Documented in Medical Chart % Documented Preoperative Bowel prep with laxative products (e.g., miralax) (N=393) 82.1 Bowel prep: mechanical (N=136) 65.4 Bowel prep with antibiotics (e.g., flagyl) (N=370) 46.8 Preoperative oral antibiotics (N=153) 50.3 Carbohydrate loading: Sugary carbohydrate rich drink before surgery (N=455) 18.3 Clear liquids up to 2 hours before surgery (N=124) 98.4 Pain medication: Injection in back or side (N=422) 38.6 Pain medication: Preoperative block (spinal, TAP, etc.) (N=167) 52.1 DVT prophylaxis before surgery (N=385) 27.8 Preop VTE Chemoprophylaxis (N=142) 95.8 Postoperative No nasogastric tube (N=512) 83.4 No nasogastric tube (N=160) 76.3 Foley catheter removed within 3 days (N=363) 73.0 Foley catheter removed within 3 days (N=143) 83.9 Pain medication: Any (N=539)Pain medication: No opioids (N=408) 94.819.3 Pain control: Multimodal (preoperative block plus postoperative medications e.g., toradol) (N=159) 70.4 Denominators vary due to missing response or ineligibility.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.