Assessing and enhancing nurse-physician communication in the infusion center to improve patient care.

78 Background: The Henry Ford Cancer Institute infusion center supports ~18,500 annual appointments, delivering hydration, blood products, and systemic therapies including investigational agents. On-call oncology fellows currently manage infusion-related evaluations, urgent issues, and real-time triage, while concurrently adhering to their assigned rotation. The high daily infusion volume results in frequent evaluation requests for non-urgent matters such as chronic symptom management and refill requests. To improve coordination and reduce workflow burden, we aimed to create a more patient-centered infusion model by conducting nurse-physician feedback sessions and implementing a standardized communication template to improve triage consistency, escalation practices, and care coordination. Methods: Structured meetings with nurses and covering physicians identified workflow inefficiencies and communication barriers. An initial department-wide session reviewed common concerns. Subsequently, a structured paging template was implemented, standardizing communication elements which included: urgency, patient identifiers, location, vitals, symptoms, clinical questions, timeline, and outreach attempts to primary oncologists. Effectiveness was assessed via message review pre- and post-intervention. Results: Post-intervention, message requests: Preserved volume of evaluations (4.33 ± 2.54 vs 4.31 ± 1.52/day; P = 0.942); reduced chronic refill requests (11.5% vs 3.6%, P = 0.0216); reduced urgent pages (29.2% vs 12.5%, P = 0.00158) and increased same-day reviews (30.8% vs 67.9%, P < 0.00001); improved routing to appropriate coverage (42.3% vs 79.5%, P < 0.00001); increased vital sign reporting (21.5% vs 43.8%, P = 0.0002); improved infusion completion (80.8% vs 93.8%, P = 0.003); increased inclusion of patient identifiers (92.3% vs 98.2%, P = 0.035); increased appropriate use of fellow coverage (66.2% vs 82.1%, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Message volume remained stable, reflecting comfort with the new system and consistent patient needs. This intervention appears to have improved triage quality, message clarity, routing accuracy, and infusion completion rates, supporting a more coordinated, efficient, and patient-centered care model. Additionally, fellows reported greater ability to prioritize learning and patient care within their primary rotation responsibilities, suggesting a positive impact on trainee workflow and overall wellness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.78
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and enhancing nurse-physician communication in the infusion center to improve patient care.

Harita Soni, Kimberly Boldig, Kashmira Wani, Kunj Patel et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Assessing and enhancing nurse-physician communication in the infusion center to improve patient care.

Harita Soni, Kimberly Boldig, Kashmira Wani, Kunj Patel, Linda Albusoul, Vijaya Donthireddy, Kyle McElyea, Abdel-Azez Abu-Samak
article en

Abstract

78 Background: The Henry Ford Cancer Institute infusion center supports ~18,500 annual appointments, delivering hydration, blood products, and systemic therapies including investigational agents. On-call oncology fellows currently manage infusion-related evaluations, urgent issues, and real-time triage, while concurrently adhering to their assigned rotation. The high daily infusion volume results in frequent evaluation requests for non-urgent matters such as chronic symptom management and refill requests. To improve coordination and reduce workflow burden, we aimed to create a more patient-centered infusion model by conducting nurse-physician feedback sessions and implementing a standardized communication template to improve triage consistency, escalation practices, and care coordination. Methods: Structured meetings with nurses and covering physicians identified workflow inefficiencies and communication barriers. An initial department-wide session reviewed common concerns. Subsequently, a structured paging template was implemented, standardizing communication elements which included: urgency, patient identifiers, location, vitals, symptoms, clinical questions, timeline, and outreach attempts to primary oncologists. Effectiveness was assessed via message review pre- and post-intervention. Results: Post-intervention, message requests: Preserved volume of evaluations (4.33 ± 2.54 vs 4.31 ± 1.52/day; P = 0.942); reduced chronic refill requests (11.5% vs 3.6%, P = 0.0216); reduced urgent pages (29.2% vs 12.5%, P = 0.00158) and increased same-day reviews (30.8% vs 67.9%, P < 0.00001); improved routing to appropriate coverage (42.3% vs 79.5%, P < 0.00001); increased vital sign reporting (21.5% vs 43.8%, P = 0.0002); improved infusion completion (80.8% vs 93.8%, P = 0.003); increased inclusion of patient identifiers (92.3% vs 98.2%, P = 0.035); increased appropriate use of fellow coverage (66.2% vs 82.1%, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Message volume remained stable, reflecting comfort with the new system and consistent patient needs. This intervention appears to have improved triage quality, message clarity, routing accuracy, and infusion completion rates, supporting a more coordinated, efficient, and patient-centered care model. Additionally, fellows reported greater ability to prioritize learning and patient care within their primary rotation responsibilities, suggesting a positive impact on trainee workflow and overall wellness.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Henry Ford Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.